|
Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
|
|
01-02-2012, 05:11 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
I found plus is much slower than oclhashcat 0.26.
For cracking 700m md5 hashes. oclhashcat 1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -->3300M/s oclhashcat-plus 1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -a 3 --<2200M/s 2x hd6970. For cracking old mysql hashes, I have to use oclhashcat 0.25 also. |
|||
|
01-02-2012, 05:15 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Try increasing the -n value. It makes a big difference in some cases. Also for some hash types I've found that increasing --gpu-loops helps.
|
|||
|
01-02-2012, 05:18 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ? | |||
|
01-02-2012, 11:16 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed
700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpredictable. maximum i tested was 24000000 hashes at once.
|
|||
|
01-02-2012, 01:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2012 02:18 PM by nobody.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
(01-02-2012 11:16 AM)atom Wrote: plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed Sorry I made a mistake, the number is 700000. This is the detail information:(two hd5870 cards, driver 11.12, windows server 2008 r2) Quote:T:\run\oclHashcat-plus>oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out Another computer(two hd6970 cards, driver 11.12 ,windows 2008 r2) Quote:Y:\run\oclHashcat-plus>oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out |
|||
|
01-02-2012, 03:53 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
as chort already said, increase the -n value:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80 |
|||
|
01-02-2012, 04:51 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
(01-02-2012 03:53 PM)atom Wrote: as chort already said, increase the -n value: Increasing -n or --gpu-loops does not help. Below is two 5870. Quote:T:\run\oclHashcat-plus>oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80 |
|||
|
01-02-2012, 08:11 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
what is the GPU utilization at during the run?
|
|||
|
01-03-2012, 09:30 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ? | |||
|
01-03-2012, 11:21 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
since brute-force has been ported from lite and not from regular oclHashcat, speeds depend a lot on the number of hashes.
for example, with 2 hashes: plus 0.07: Speed........: 5013.7M c/s Real, 5085.7M c/s GPU regular 0.26: Speed.GPU*...: 4035.2M/s with 100 hashes: plus 0.07: Speed........: 4581.0M c/s Real, 4884.6M c/s GPU regular 0.26: Speed.GPU*...: 3968.6M/s event horizon is somewhere around 1000 hashes. also, if you take a look at docs/todo.txt it contains this line: - Should use oclHashcat-lite's candidate generator to lower GPU idle times once this has been done, it will again boost a lot in speed
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help




700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpredictable. maximum i tested was 24000000 hashes at once.
