+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: Unique Master Citizen Number Rule? (/thread-2282.html)
Unique Master Citizen Number Rule? - viktorx - 05-05-2013
Hello. I'm trying to create a rule for my wpa cracking and basicly this is what I have in mind:
1 0, 1, 2, 3
2 0-9
3 0, 1
4 0-9
5 0, 9
6 0-9
7 0-9
8 7
9 1-9
10 0-9
11 0-9
12 0-9
13 0-9
It contains 13 numbers with this numbers generating on each place. Basically it's unique master citizen number of people born in my region. Can someone help me create this rule?
RE: Unique Master Citizen Number Rule? - philsmd - 05-05-2013
Hi, you are searching for a specific/custom mask?
Try this one:
-1 0123 -2 01 -3 09 -4 123456789 ?1?d?2?d?3?d?d7?4?d?d?d?d
I'm no mask expert, but should work (-1 up to -4 are cusom charsets, see also -h i.e. --custom-charset[1-4]=CS)
RE: Unique Master Citizen Number Rule? - viktorx - 05-05-2013
Thanks, this is actually exactly what I needed! Now I know how this mask works. Too bad it only has 4 custom character sets and not more
but for my test this will do the job done! Thanks, once again!
RE: Unique Master Citizen Number Rule? - Rolf - 05-05-2013
You can use this approach:
Code:
... -1 123456789 0?d0?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 1?d0?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 2?d0?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 3?d0?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 0?d1?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 1?d1?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 2?d1?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 3?d1?d0?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 0?d0?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 1?d0?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 2?d0?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 3?d0?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 0?d1?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 1?d1?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 2?d1?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?d
... -1 123456789 3?d1?d9?d?d7?1?d?d?d?dAlso, to speed things up, you should have remove flag in the unmentioned section.
Well, the approach I brought up MAY actually be slower due to the internal mask generator of lite/plus - cat.