|
Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
|
05-24-2012, 11:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2012 06:33 PM by Hash-IT.)
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Another update to this. I have been trying to generate a dictionary using this method and it is so slow I don't think it is a viable option.
M@lik do you have any suggestions ? I read the thread you linked to today regarding just random guesses and atom seemed to like it. I hope this interest can be extended to this idea also. I like to think of it as pseudo brute force or at least an educated guess !! ![]() In your example above Quote:mp64 ?u?u?u?u?u?u?u?u | sed '/\([A-Z]\)\1\1/d' I can see that you have 8 characters, when I try to do the same I can leave my computer for many hours and nothing is generated. Although when I do 6 characters I get results. Could there be an issue where the windows based version cannot handle >7 characters ? Edit.. I have a little more information on this last >7 problem. I can actually make 8 characters but if I use less than \1\1\1 nothing happens for hours. I guess the filter is incredibly slow or there is something wrong as your example has only \1\1 !!! Another update.... If and I mean a big if I have my calculations correct..and I am more than open to the possibility I don't, but just assuming the best case, I think if we had this feature or pre-prepared dictionaries an attack on a wpa of 8 upper alpha only should be reduced by about 18%. That's pretty significant I think ! |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help



