benchmark list?

[fast_checkmate]

Is it available?
I'm wondering if we could setup a database with the gpu's so people can see how good a videocard chipset handles ..

we could make a .bat / .cmd /.sh file to run a script of hashcat with a example hash and a example dictionary.


the more specific question is .. how much c/s can a 5850 or 6950 do compared to a 4850 (which handles about 17000 c/s) when cracking wpa hashes

[atom]

There is no such comparisation chart. All we have is the chart on http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/ itself.

These old hd4xxx are very bad since they do not fully support fast memory access in OpenCL. CAL based crackers are faster for hd4xxx.

[fast_checkmate]

between a 6950 (1408 shaders @800Mhz) and 5870 (1600 shaders @850Mhz) what should i choose?
the math tells me i should point the older 5870 as a winner..

[KT819GM]

5870 you have to compare with 6970 not 6950. Anyway, 5870 and 5970 goes better on same clocks than 6970 and 6990.

[fast_checkmate]

the price of 5870 is equal to the price of 6950 this was the only reason i was comparing them
do you know how many c/s does each provide?

[atom]

the 5870 is around 80k/s, 6950 around 70k/s

[fast_checkmate]

5870 @ 850Mhz ~ 89500 c/s
5870 @ 940 ~ 98700 c/s



compared to Elcomsoft's software that only does 67k c/s using all the cores at 100% of my I2500k@4GHz

Atom, you should charge money for this software!

[chort]

(10-01-2011 01:30 AM)atom Wrote:  the 5870 is around 80k/s, 6950 around 70k/s

I wish I had known that before I bought a 6950

Is there a ranked list of preference for price/performance somewhere?

[fast_checkmate]

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardwa...ning_Cards

or multiply the number of the shaders with the shader frequency (different from the gpu frequency for Nvidia cards) and compare cards, it should give a very good indicator

[chort]

(10-06-2011 09:08 AM)fast_checkmate Wrote:  multiply the number of the shaders with the shader frequency (different from the gpu frequency for Nvidia cards) and compare cards, it should give a very good indicator

That makes perfect sense, thanks!