hashcat Forum

Full Version: Speedcheck please
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

I just wanted to ask to see if others thought this speed is correct, as the hardware is old and I have no idea what to expect!

Windows 8.1 64 bit, Intel Core i7 920 (8core @ 2.67Ghz).

Latest version of hashcat, hashing against WPA with 8 char password, all lower case alpla only.

Command I am using:

hashcat-cli64.exe -m 2500 -a 3 wpa.hccap --pw-min= 8 --custom-charset= ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?L

Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l) [8]
Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 208827064576 (words), 0 (bytes)
Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts
Speed/sec.: - plains, 2.38k words
Progress..: 11746836/208827064576 (0.01%)
Running...: 00:01:22:17
Estimated.: 285:21:46:48

Obviously with it like this I'm going to be waiting a long time!

On my CPU widget all 8 cores are maxed out.

Same with oclhash on same PC, running Nvidia GeForce GT 630. Downloaded and installed latest Cuda Toolkit.

cudaHashcat64.exe -m 2500 -a 3 wpa.hccap -1 ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l

Session.Name...: cudaHashcat
Status.........: Aborted
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3) [8]
Hash.Type......: WPA/WPA2
Time.Started...: Fri Oct 24 04:57:55 2014 (1 min, 34 secs)
Time.Estimated.: > 10 Years
Speed.GPU.#1...: 8174 H/s
Recovered......: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.......: 761856/5533380698112 (0.00%)
Skipped........: 0/761856 (0.00%)
Rejected.......: 0/761856 (0.00%)
HWMon.GPU.#1...: 20% Util, 60c Temp, N/A Fan

Started: Fri Oct 24 04:57:55 2014
Stopped: Fri Oct 24 04:59:30 2014

Should I decide to shop about for a better card, is there a website which lists expected hashrates on various models so can get a better idea on budget vs speed?

EDIT: Just seen the keyspace totals are wildly different, so I know the syntax is wrong lol, but original question stands, are those speeds right :p
Speeds are alright.
You can compare bang for buck here.

Keyspace is different because the second example's output is for a different command (take a look at the mask).
(10-24-2014, 12:25 PM)Rolf Wrote: [ -> ]Keyspace is different because the second example's output is for a different command (take a look at the mask).
not the mask but wrong usage.
Thanks guys, figured out the right syntax Smile
Just out of curiosity.

When figuring out hash rates, apart from cores/clock speed, how much influence does things like RAM and HDD speed make?
here's the formular:
(((amount of ram in gb)*(cpu clock speed in GHz))/((hdd size in gb)*(hdd max read speed in mb/s)+(wordlist size in gb)))*ln(1)
how long did it take you to think that up? Wink
I see what you did there Big Grin