02-26-2020, 05:17 AM
02-26-2020, 08:58 AM
what do you mean ? mask attack (-a 3) ?
there is no such thing as alphanumeric chars in hashcat built-in charsets: we only have the single groups of characters like ?d,?l,?u and the combination of them (together with specials, ?s): ?a
alphanumeric probably would be either using --custom-charset1 ?l?d or --custom-charset1 ?u?d or both cases --custom-charset1 ?l?u?d
You need to be more specif about what you mean.
My best guess would be that you need something like this: https://hashcat.net/faq/morework (e.g. using -S or pipe/stdin as a workaround or similar)
there is no such thing as alphanumeric chars in hashcat built-in charsets: we only have the single groups of characters like ?d,?l,?u and the combination of them (together with specials, ?s): ?a
alphanumeric probably would be either using --custom-charset1 ?l?d or --custom-charset1 ?u?d or both cases --custom-charset1 ?l?u?d
You need to be more specif about what you mean.
My best guess would be that you need something like this: https://hashcat.net/faq/morework (e.g. using -S or pipe/stdin as a workaround or similar)
02-26-2020, 05:46 PM
there are only 10 digits instead around 25 for letters
8 character only digit has 99999999 combinations
8 character ONLY larger LETTERS 152857890625 combinations
If that is what you mean by slow then afors.
8 character only digit has 99999999 combinations
8 character ONLY larger LETTERS 152857890625 combinations
If that is what you mean by slow then afors.
02-27-2020, 04:36 AM
?h is much faster mask than ?a in brute Force attacks
02-27-2020, 11:25 AM
(02-27-2020, 04:36 AM)Ulfr11 Wrote: [ -> ]?h is much faster mask than ?a in brute Force attacks
?h is hex - [0-9a-f]
?a is "ALL" I think, not alpha, so basically all the printable ASCII - hence MUCH slower.
?b really is all possible bytes