03-02-2021, 05:55 AM
Cracking ethereum presale (-m 16300) using 2080Ti.
Benchmark
Hashcat command:
seems to work OK but I get the following warning:
I've checked OpenCL and Nvidia Drivers. I'll try -2 3
My big question is about morework.
I've read the wiki. Is this a general suggestion or could this small function really be run through a pipe.
Alternatively, I was trying to run this as two rules on a smaller dict.txt file but this just memmed out.
Perhaps I could go back and run that through a pipe instead of two separate operations with larger final dict.txt and a single rule?
Benchmark
Code:
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, 2754/11018 MB allocatable, 68MCU
Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable
Hashmode: 16300 - Ethereum Pre-Sale Wallet, PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 (Iterations: 1999)
Speed.#1.........: 1546.8 kH/s (87.29ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:128 Thr:256 Vec:1
Hashcat command:
Code:
hashcat -m 16300 --session hashcat -w 3 hash.txt dictl.txt -r append.rule -o cracked.txt
seems to work OK but I get the following warning:
Code:
Dictionary cache built:
* Filename..: dict.txt
* Passwords.: 120717312
* Bytes.....: 1907097600
* Keyspace..: 51919912304640
* Runtime...: 6 secs
Cracking performance lower than expected?
* Append -w 3 to the commandline.
This can cause your screen to lag.
* Update your OpenCL runtime / driver the right way:
https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver
* Create more work items to make use of your parallelization power:
https://hashcat.net/faq/morework
I've checked OpenCL and Nvidia Drivers. I'll try -2 3
My big question is about morework.
I've read the wiki. Is this a general suggestion or could this small function really be run through a pipe.
Alternatively, I was trying to run this as two rules on a smaller dict.txt file but this just memmed out.
Code:
hashcat -m 16300 -a 0 -w 3 hash.txt dict.txt -r rule_case.rule -r rule_leet.rule --stdout -o dict2.txt
Perhaps I could go back and run that through a pipe instead of two separate operations with larger final dict.txt and a single rule?