hashcat wont bruteforce - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: Old hashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-20.html) +--- Thread: hashcat wont bruteforce (/thread-1956.html) Pages:
1
2
|
hashcat wont bruteforce - DaaQ - 01-15-2013 Hi, i try to bruteforce a simple hash (pw: test) and im use this command line: ./hashcat-cli32.bin -m 0 -a 3 --pw-min=4 --pw-max=4 hash.txt ?l But i only get this output: Initializing hashcat v0.42 by atom with 8 threads and 32mb segment size... Added hashes from file hash.txt: 1 (1 salts) Activating quick-digest mode for single-hash NOTE: press enter for status-screen Started: Tue Jan 15 10:55:45 2013 Stopped: Tue Jan 15 10:55:45 2013 Why hashcat wont crack the hash? RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - K9 - 01-15-2013 http://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=brute_force_attack RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - DaaQ - 01-15-2013 Ive also tried ./hashcat-cli32.bin -m 0 -a 3 hash.txt ?l?l?l?l but the result is the same RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - Waffle - 01-15-2013 There's something fundamental wrong. Try creating the hash with a known program, make it simple: md5 -s "a" for example. If you can't crack that, then your distribution may be corrupt, or something equally strange. The program works just fine in brute force mode for me. RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - blandyuk - 01-15-2013 DaaQ, post the hash your testing... RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - DaaQ - 01-15-2013 d8e8fca2dc0f896fd7cb4cb0031ba249 Input.Mode: Mask (?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 26 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 26/26 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 676 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 676/676 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 17576 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 17576/17576 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l?l?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 456976 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 456976/456976 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- Started: Tue Jan 15 22:15:03 2013 Stopped: Tue Jan 15 22:15:05 2013 RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - forumhero - 01-15-2013 that's not the correct md5 hash of the word "test" it should be this: 098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6 RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - DaaQ - 01-15-2013 Yep, same result here. Why echo test | md5sum isnt the correct hash? oO RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - forumhero - 01-15-2013 use this command instead of echo: md5 -s "test" works for me ./hashcat-cli64.app -a 3 md5.txt ?l?l?l?l Initializing hashcat v0.42 by atom with 8 threads and 32mb segment-size... Added hashes from file md5.txt: 1 (1 salts) Activating quick-digest mode for single-hash NOTE: press enter for status-screen Input.Mode: Mask (?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 26 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 26/26 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 676 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 676/676 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l?l) Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 17576 (words), 0 (bytes) Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts Speed/sec.: - plains, - words Progress..: 17576/17576 (100.00%) Running...: --:--:--:-- Estimated.: --:--:--:-- 098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6:test All hashes have been recovered RE: hashcat wont bruteforce - epixoip - 01-16-2013 (01-15-2013, 11:26 PM)DaaQ Wrote: Why echo test | md5sum isnt the correct hash? oO because you did "echo test" instead of "echo -n test", which means you hashed "test\n" instead of "test" |