Session issue - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Session issue (/thread-2712.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Session issue - Mem5 - 10-13-2013 I want to use sessions, but does not work, what am I doing wrong ?? using oclHashcat-plus-0.15\oclHashcat-plus64.exe Code: oclplus.exe -a 3 -m 2500 --session=wpa_10digits --restore-timer=1800 --increment-min=10 --increment-max=10 --gpu-temp-abort=90 "wpa.hccap" ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d I stop it after 5 min. Then I launch : Code: oclplus.exe --restore --session=wpa_10digits But this command restart the task from scratch (0 sec), and not from 5 min ! Why ? Thanks. RE: Session issue - epixoip - 10-13-2013 don't look at the time, look at the progress. RE: Session issue - Mem5 - 10-14-2013 I've just checked, I left the progress at 0.16%, I launch the restore, it begun at 0.00%. RE: Session issue - Mem5 - 10-14-2013 Any idea ? RE: Session issue - radix - 10-14-2013 Code: radix@katana:~/hashcat/oclHashcat-plus-0.15$ ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -a 3 -m 2500 --session=wpa_10digits --restore-timer=1800 --increment-min=10 --increment-max=10 --gpu-temp-abort=90 test.hccap ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -d 2 Seems to be working, but I did abort the run early. Can you drop your runtimer down to say 5 mins and see if it still happens? Also, increment-min/max isn't needed if you aren't incrementing in the first place. RE: Session issue - radix - 10-14-2013 Just your luck, someone else came into IRC and had the same issue with cudaHashcat-plus64 not working with sessions. Please file a ticket on trac so that it can be worked. RE: Session issue - Mem5 - 10-15-2013 OK. But why is it working with you ? RE: Session issue - atom - 10-15-2013 remember that the .restore file is written only at specific times. it might not be an issue, you maybe stopped to early and it did not had a chance to write the file. especially when you increase the -n value and in combination with a slow hash, the runtime for a single complete kernel run can take a lot of time. the background therefore is the gpu kernels that are running. the restore progress can only be written when a full kernel run is finished. if it wouldn't do it that way parts of the keyspace that wasn't tested would be lost (the parts that did not have been calculated). so it has to wait for kernel run finish, then update progress count, then it can write .restore file. RE: Session issue - Mem5 - 10-15-2013 I understand. So the switch "--restore-timer=NUM Save restore file each NUM seconds" is not properly what it means ? RE: Session issue - radix - 10-16-2013 (10-15-2013, 04:34 PM)atom Wrote: remember that the .restore file is written only at specific times. it might not be an issue, you maybe stopped to early and it did not had a chance to write the file. especially when you increase the -n value and in combination with a slow hash, the runtime for a single complete kernel run can take a lot of time. While this is quite possible, I ran his command line on linux and got a proper session file even after quitting after just 4 minutes. Per yesterdays conversation with someone else using windows with cudaHashcat-plus, the might be a bug in the windows version. He had the same problem with the restore file being empty. |