+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: User Contributions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-25.html)
+--- Thread: Keyboard Walks (/thread-3614.html)
Pages:
1
2
Keyboard Walks - richk - 08-15-2014
I've been doing some work on generating keyboard walks. Thought I would post here to see if anyone finds the information useful.
Source:
https://github.com/Rich5/Keyboard-Walk-Generators
Blog spam for more detailed explanation:
http://frogstarworldc.com/2014/08/generating-keyboard-walks/
RE: Keyboard Walks - epixoip - 08-15-2014
Thanks for sharing! At first glance this appears to be very well done.
RE: Keyboard Walks - richk - 08-15-2014
(08-15-2014, 02:15 PM)epixoip Wrote: Thanks for sharing! At first glance this appears to be very well done.
Thanks! I've been using method 2 and getting good results for my purposes, but I'm far from an expert at password cracking. If anyone uses this I'd love to hear feedback.
RE: Keyboard Walks - atom - 08-15-2014
thanks!
RE: Keyboard Walks - atom - 08-15-2014
Btw using -a 1 is the same as the combinator mode, this way you may save some wordlist space plus you have a nice multiplicator option for fast hashes
RE: Keyboard Walks - richk - 08-15-2014
(08-15-2014, 04:44 PM)atom Wrote: Btw using -a 1 is the same as the combinator mode, this way you may save some wordlist space plus you have a nice multiplicator option for fast hashes
very cool! I was trying to leverage rules, but after looking at this, http://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2391.html, I noticed that there are several ways to accomplish the same thing.
Just so I understand, with combinator mode can I input my seed file of 4 length walks and expand them into length 16? I currently get good results with combining the seed file into length 8 then again to 16, but if oclHashcat does this out of the box I'll use that instead.
RE: Keyboard Walks - Kgx Pnqvhm - 08-16-2014
Using the hashcat-utils' combinator.exe is likely quicker than combinator.py.
And the new (but undocumented) combinator3.exe creates the in-between 12 character combinations, e.g.:
>combinator3.exe 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt > 12charwalk.txt
Another interesting idea is using the tmesis.pl from Yiannis Chrysanthou's (aka T0XlC) "I have the #cat so I make the rules" presentation at the recent Passwords Con 2014 Las Vegas. (Also in the new, but undocumented hashcat-utils.)
RE: Keyboard Walks - richk - 08-17-2014
(08-16-2014, 02:17 PM)Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: Using the hashcat-utils' combinator.exe is likely quicker than combinator.py.
And the new (but undocumented) combinator3.exe creates the in-between 12 character combinations, e.g.:
>combinator3.exe 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt > 12charwalk.txt
Another interesting idea is using the tmesis.pl from Yiannis Chrysanthou's (aka T0XlC) "I have the #cat so I make the rules" presentation at the recent Passwords Con 2014 Las Vegas. (Also in the new, but undocumented hashcat-utils.)
I agree that combinator.exe is most likely quicker than combinator.py, and I'll give combinator3.exe a try and see how that works out.
Is the talk from T0XIC available somewhere to view?
RE: Keyboard Walks - coolbry95 - 08-17-2014
there it is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fMwhSlC9HM&index=14&list=PLdIqs92nsIzRFk0OCN_uQiOkgtPiNk2mv
RE: Keyboard Walks - lickme - 08-25-2014
Thanks
