+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: Multi Rules Problem (/thread-740.html)
Pages:
1
2
Multi Rules Problem - Hash-IT - 12-18-2011
Hi atom
Sorry to have to report that the multi rules doesn’t work for me. This could obviously be entirely my fault however.
To reproduce
oclHashcat-plus-0.07b3
WPA.hcap password = PASSWORD
Test password list contains passwor
Rule file 1 contains u
Rule file 2 contains $D
The password is not found.
Rule 1 should add u to upper all and rule 2 should append D
So …u$D should have been passed to oclhashcatplus causing it to upper case all and append D = PASSWORD.
As I say this could be my fault.
RE: Multi Rules Problem - atom - 12-18-2011
hmm, strange, works for me. maybe you should paste your cmdline and the hccap as well.
Quote:root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# cat > word
passwor
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# cat > rule1
u
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# cat > rule2
$D
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# mkpasswd -m md5 PASSWORD
$1$UA9o/mkq$GNZXK4/40ktLsNSN5CG.A.
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 500 '$1$UA9o/mkq$GNZXK4/40ktLsNSN5CG.A.' word -r rule1 -r rule2
oclHashcat-plus v0.07 by atom starting...
Hashes: 1
Unique salts: 1
Unique digests: 1
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Rules: 1
GPU-Loops: 128
GPU-Accel: 40
Password lengths range: 1 - 15
Platform: AMD compatible platform found
Watchdog: Temperature limit set to 90c
Device #1: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
Device #2: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
Device #1: Allocating 120MB host-memory
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0500.Cypress.64.kernel (567082 bytes)
Device #2: Allocating 120MB host-memory
Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0500.Cypress.64.kernel (567082 bytes)
Scanned dictionary word: 8 bytes, 1 words, 1 keyspace, starting attack...
$1$UA9o/mkq$GNZXK4/40ktLsNSN5CG.A.ASSWORD
Status.......: Cracked
Input.Mode...: File (word)
Hash.Target..: $1$UA9o/mkq$GNZXK4/40ktLsNSN5CG.A.
Hash.Type....: md5crypt, MD5(Unix), FreeBSD MD5, Cisco-IOS MD5
Time.Running.: 1 sec
Time.Util....: 1000.3ms/0.0ms Real/CPU, 0.0% idle
Speed........: 1 c/s Real, 0 c/s GPU
Recovered....: 1/1 Digests, 1/1 Salts
Progress.....: 1/1 (100.00%)
Rejected.....: 0/1 (0.00%)
HW.Monitor.#1: 86% GPU, 55c Temp
HW.Monitor.#2: 86% GPU, 53c Temp
Started: Sun Dec 18 21:20:53 2011
Stopped: Sun Dec 18 21:21:09 2011
RE: Multi Rules Problem - Hash-IT - 12-19-2011
Hmm.. cough.
Due to my experiences of ever questioning or doubting your code, I have learnt to display copious amounts of a$$ covering before posting.
Here
Quote:This could obviously be entirely my fault however.
...and here...
Quote:As I say this could be my fault.
It would now appear this approach was a wise decision.
Please accept my apologies, I am an idiot.
RE: Multi Rules Problem - nobody - 12-19-2011
How can we get the 0.07b3?
RE: Multi Rules Problem - Hash-IT - 12-19-2011
(12-19-2011, 07:09 PM)nobody Wrote: How can we get the 0.07b3?
You can't "get it" you are given it
I think atom took pity on me as I manged to receive a copy by being an enthusiastic idiot, you will have to think of another way !!
Unfortunately one of the conditions is that I do not redistribute it. So I am sorry if I seem a little mean not giving copies out but there is no way I would break the confidence.
I am hopeful a full release will be available soon.
RE: Multi Rules Problem - Hash-IT - 12-19-2011
atom,
Just so this thread hasn't wasted your time completely, would it be possible to change the --help file of oclHashcat-plus with regards to the rule files ?
Where it says ...
Quote:-r, --rules-file=FILE Rules-file, multiple use is supported
Could it say,
Quote:-r, --rules-file=FILE Rules-file, multiple use is supported, -r 1.rule -r 2.rule etc
Thanks.
10 hashcat points to anyone who can guess where I was going wrong before !!
!!
RE: Multi Rules Problem - shapleigh - 12-20-2011
you were using -r 1.rule 2.rule and it was generating PASSWOR$D, as result of treading 2.rule as a word file?
RE: Multi Rules Problem - atom - 12-20-2011
(12-19-2011, 10:12 PM)Hash-IT Wrote: atom,
Just so this thread hasn't wasted your time completely, would it be possible to change the --help file of oclHashcat-plus with regards to the rule files ?
Where it says ...
Quote:-r, --rules-file=FILE Rules-file, multiple use is supported
Could it say,
Quote:-r, --rules-file=FILE Rules-file, multiple use is supported, -r 1.rule -r 2.rule etc
Thanks.
10 hashcat points to anyone who can guess where I was going wrong before !!
i can not, it will exceed 78 chars in length
RE: Multi Rules Problem - Hash-IT - 12-20-2011
(12-20-2011, 02:56 AM)shapleigh Wrote: you were using -r 1.rule 2.rule and it was generating PASSWOR$D, as result of treading 2.rule as a word file?
Yes, thats right !
OK You get 10 hashcat points !! ... Not sure what you can do with them but look after them in case they are worth something in the future !
I was thinking like aircrack as in rule1.rule,rule2.rule etc I wasn't using the -r each time.(12-20-2011, 10:20 AM)atom Wrote: i can not, it will exceed 78 chars in length
ok, can you think of a better way so you don't get more idiots like me ?
Perhaps...
Quote:-r, --rules-file=FILE Rules-file, multiple use, -r 1.rule -r 2.rule
RE: Multi Rules Problem - atom - 12-21-2011
much better, changed that