+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? (/thread-1480.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - atom - 08-22-2012
Looks like this is an gtx 6xx problem. Can you please try with oclHashcat-lite? It ships with some kernels compiled with a new cuda sdk.
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - bob - 08-22-2012
oclHashcat-lite does not have wpa2 support, but the example looks like it worked just fine. When could we expect gtx 6xx support for oclHashcat-plus?
Code:
root@bt:~/oclHashcat-lite-0.10# ./cudaExample.sh
cudaHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting...
Password lengths range: 1 - 55
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 680, 2047MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU
Device #2: GeForce GTX 680, 2047MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Status.......: Running
Hash.Target..: 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe
Hash.Type....: MD5
Time.Running.: 0 secs
Time.Left....: 29 secs
Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2
Plain.Text...: ***atte
Plain.Length.: 7
Progress.....: 1509949440/134960504832 (1.12%)
Speed.GPU.#1.: 2247.7M/s
Speed.GPU.#2.: 2239.8M/s
Speed.GPU.#*.: 4487.5M/s
HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 69c Temp, 41% Fan
HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 68c Temp, 40% Fan
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Status.......: Running
Hash.Target..: 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe
Hash.Type....: MD5
Time.Running.: 15 secs
Time.Left....: 14 secs
Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2
Plain.Text...: ***0dhb
Plain.Length.: 7
Progress.....: 71156367360/134960504832 (52.72%)
Speed.GPU.#1.: 2224.0M/s
Speed.GPU.#2.: 2228.9M/s
Speed.GPU.#*.: 4452.9M/s
HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 72c Temp, 45% Fan
HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 71c Temp, 44% Fan
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Status.......: Running
Hash.Target..: 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe
Hash.Type....: MD5
Time.Running.: 10 mins, 10 secs
Time.Left....: 10 mins, 31 secs
Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3
Plain.Text...: ***y5ce0
Plain.Length.: 8
Progress.....: 2720016629760/5533380698112 (49.16%)
Speed.GPU.#1.: 2225.8M/s
Speed.GPU.#2.: 2228.0M/s
Speed.GPU.#*.: 4453.8M/s
HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 79c Temp, 56% Fan
HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 77c Temp, 54% Fan
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit =>RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - atom - 08-22-2012
Soon
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - mtr0ll - 08-23-2012
(08-22-2012, 09:50 AM)atom Wrote: Looks like this is an gtx 6xx problem. Can you please try with oclHashcat-lite? It ships with some kernels compiled with a new cuda sdk.
I can also confirm that it is 'working' with the lite version. However, the rate is not what I'm expecting. I only get 136M c/s for ntlm on GT650M. Can someone confirm if that's expected?
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - atom - 08-23-2012
WOW, that is crazy slow. I have no exact predictions for 6xx but its known to be slower than 4xx and 5xx series for hash cracking.
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - bob - 08-23-2012
Well now that I have the command right this time (I think) speeds are looking fine to me.
Code:
root@bt:~/oclHashcat-lite-0.10# ./cudaHashcat-lite64.bin -m 1000 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
cudaHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting...
Password lengths range: 1 - 55
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 680, 2047MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU
Device #2: GeForce GTX 680, 2047MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Status.......: Running
Hash.Target..: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Hash.Type....: NTLM
Time.Running.: 0 secs
Time.Left....: 20 secs
Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2
Plain.Text...: **4j4s0
Plain.Length.: 7
Progress.....: 3177185280/134960504832 (2.35%)
Speed.GPU.#1.: 3149.2M/s
Speed.GPU.#2.: 3156.4M/s
Speed.GPU.#*.: 6305.6M/s
HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 68c Temp, 40% Fan
HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 66c Temp, 38% Fan
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit =>RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - mtr0ll - 08-24-2012
Well, I wasn't expecting that poor performance from GT650. It looks like it's running it on a single cpu core though (if I check the cpu utilization). Is that possible?
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - atom - 08-24-2012
No, the CPU is untouched with oclHashcat-lite -> 0%