LM hash support for OCLHC - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Feature Requests (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC (/thread-167.html) |
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - panda - 11-18-2011 LM in oclhc* gets my vote as well. RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - Mem5 - 01-01-2012 atom, do you have any news about the crack of LM hashes in hashat or oclhashcat ? For future releases ? Thanks RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - atom - 02-01-2012 LM will be added next version! RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - mabu - 02-02-2012 Very nice!! RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - Mem5 - 02-02-2012 Many thanks! RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - mastercracker - 02-04-2012 (02-01-2012, 11:27 PM)atom Wrote: LM will be added next version!Will it be in the OCLhashcat-plus version as well? It would benefit people with multi-hash because one by one on the -lite would be tideous. RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - atom - 02-04-2012 ofc mastercracker.. oclHashcat-lite is like a formula 1 racing car. its good for experience and then backport stuff to oclHashcat-plus RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - chort - 02-05-2012 Here's how I'd like LM to work: - Accepts 16char or 32char hash - Outputs the plain for each independently, even in outfile (i.e. the hash length in outfile is 16char) - Can reassemble whole plain with --show - Crack right hash first, because in nearly every case it will be faster than the left hash (and will probably give clues about the left half) - Optionally break masks > 8 and apply to each half in the order given (i.e. ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?d?d?d would become <left>?l?l?l?l?l?l?l <right>?d?d?d) - Alternatively, display error for masks longer than 7 RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - fatalx - 02-05-2012 When is the next release including LM due to be released? RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - chort - 02-05-2012 oclHashcat-lite-0.09 already supports LM. The next release to support LM will likely be oclHashcat-plus-0.08. |