+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html)
+--- Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? (/thread-3008.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? - blazer - 01-15-2014
(01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)LDA Wrote: Wow, you rock! Awesome.
Can you give me example of 64-bit algorithms? Very interesting subject.
Where come from these numbers? Your tests?
Thanks.
Sha 512 should be an example
RE: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? - epixoip - 01-15-2014
(01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)LDA Wrote: Can you give me example of 64-bit algorithms?
as stated in post #7 of this thread, sha512 and sha3 are examples of 64-bit aglorithms.
(01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)LDA Wrote: Where come from these numbers? Your tests?
yes.
RE: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? - Bobmarley2021 - 02-09-2014
In the case of WPA which is 128-bit or even WPA2 (256-bit?) how does this card shape up?
RE: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? - magnum - 02-09-2014
(02-09-2014, 12:32 PM)Bobmarley2021 Wrote: In the case of WPA which is 128-bit or even WPA2 (256-bit?) how does this card shape up?
The heavy stuff in WPA is SHA1, so 32-bit.
RE: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? - marsman007 - 08-15-2014
(01-12-2014, 09:08 AM)epixoip Wrote: 290X is 1-2% faster than a 6990 for 32-bit register-based algorithms, 90% faster for des-based algorithms, and 50% slower for 64-bit algorithms.
What would be the best card today for SAP CODVN B (BCODE) and/or SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE).
Can not find out the type? I am thinking of 290(x) or 7970 or 7990. Or is there a better alternative?
RE: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]? - epixoip - 08-15-2014
When in doubt, buy a 290X.