NTLM hash, how practical is it? - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: General Help (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: NTLM hash, how practical is it? (/thread-3157.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - mastercracker - 02-23-2014 (02-22-2014, 01:49 PM)ToJ Wrote: When I run -m 1000 the mask is set to ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3 and my 8-char test-pwd isn't caught. How can I make sure that ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a is tested? (I know, but I expect the pwd to be 8-12 chars, effectively randomized...)Either you did not hash your test password properly or your mask is not matching your password. It's always a good idea to include an hash with a known value to make sure that everything is set properly. Post your command line so that we can understand what is going on. RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - ToJ - 02-23-2014 It is actually as posted above, but with -m 1000 instead. So what I am looking at is: oclhashcat64.exe -m 1000 ha.hash -a 3 Atm I am trying to figure out how to change the mask... RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - epixoip - 02-23-2014 just add "?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a" to the end of that command. |