AMD Radeon R9 290X speed and noise. - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X speed and noise. (/thread-3510.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X speed and noise. - rickm - 07-01-2014 Thanks epixoip. I guess you example means: Core (Mhz) - 1050 Memory (Mhz) - 1375 And what is the power one? Also, based on my tests with a big wordlist and best64 rule, the --gpu-accel=160 --gpu-loops=1024 appears to produce better results. Do you use anything different? If yes, can you give a brief about the reason? Thanks for all your help. RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X speed and noise. - epixoip - 07-01-2014 yes, 1050 Mhz core & 1375 Mhz memory. the `power=50' value is for powertune and tells the card it may use up to 50% more electricity than normal to power the card. the -n/-u settings you use will vary per algorithm. the appropriate -n/-u values for each algorithm can be found by benchmarking that algorithm. for example, with md5crypt, `oclHashcat64.bin -b -m 500' reports: Code: Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5(Unix), FreeBSD MD5, Cisco-IOS MD5 therefore you should use -n 128 -u 1000 for this algorithm. alternatively, you can just omit -n/-u and just use "-w 3" instead. it will automatically use the optimal -n/-u values for each algorithm. RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X speed and noise. - rickm - 07-02-2014 Hi epixoip, Great explanation. 50% more electricity is a LOT! I'm curious if 50% more electricity pays off the overclocking of 50Mhz. What is your experience on it? Great, I was unable to find this "-w 3" on the manual, but it works very well. Thanks |