![]() |
What attack to use? - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: Old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-38.html) +--- Thread: What attack to use? (/thread-5074.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: What attack to use? - Marc05 - 01-23-2016 Perhaps not. As I understand it, if I have a wordlist called 3words.txt consisting of "a, b, c" and run combinator, I will end up with: ab, ac, ba, bc, ca, cb - whereas I want: abc. If that is the case, then combinaotr3 wouldn't work either with a wordlist consisting of 4 words. I know that the password would be at least a combination of 8 words, and up to a combination of 18 words. However, if a wordlist has to be generated, and hashcat can't generate and try the password at the same time, I'd have to create a more sensible wordlist that contains the more probable password of 8 to 14 combinations. I think that would be up to 14! combinations, which at 9000 H/s is not bad. RE: What attack to use? - epixoip - 01-23-2016 If you want "abc" then combinator3.bin is precisely what you want... If your wordlist contains the following: Code: apple Then ''./combinator3.bin wordlist wordlist wordlist'' is going to generate: Code: appleappleapple And you can pipe this directly into oclHashcat via stdin if you'd like. But now you're also saying 8-18 words? Not making much sense, especially since you also previously said the password is only 24 characters max. Anyway, all the pieces are here for you to formulate your attack. RE: What attack to use? - Marc05 - 01-23-2016 Apologies if I'm making it hard to understand, and thanks for trying to help. In the chance that you're familiar with OTFBrutus, I could do what I'm asking with the following: (red|blue|black|green){2-4:1} This generates a variable-length combination pattern with no word repeating more than once; which would at least contain "redblue", and at most "greenblackbluered". I want to do this exact thing with hashcat, except it would be (...){8-14:1}. RE: What attack to use? - epixoip - 01-23-2016 Yeah that's not possible with hashcat or combinator.bin, you're going to have repeating words. And of course 8-14 you're going to start running into disk limitations real quick. RE: What attack to use? - magnum - 01-29-2016 Wouldn't PRINCE be a good choice here? Pro: Super simple. Con: I believe you can't stop it from using elements more than once in a candidate. |