My practice attempt to decrypt a SHA-256 hash of an IP address - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: My practice attempt to decrypt a SHA-256 hash of an IP address (/thread-7328.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: My practice attempt to decrypt a SHA-256 hash of an IP address - undeath - 02-27-2018 I have no idea what your scripts are doing but they are doing it wrong. The hcmask file definitely does not allow leading zeros. RE: My practice attempt to decrypt a SHA-256 hash of an IP address - royce - 02-27-2018 I didn't write that paste, just grabbed it because it did the job. Works for me: Code: # Get the masks file. Also, undeath - that mask file *does* allow for leading zeroes - all the ones with .?1?2 or .?2?1. (And those could be valid IPs in some circumstances.) RE: My practice attempt to decrypt a SHA-256 hash of an IP address - undeath - 02-27-2018 no, it doesn't. there are no instances of .?1 or .?2 and a "normal" IPv4 representation does not have leading zeros I generated that hcmask file RE: My practice attempt to decrypt a SHA-256 hash of an IP address - royce - 02-27-2018 (02-27-2018, 06:29 PM)undeath Wrote: no, it doesn't. there are no instances of .?1 or .?2 That's what I get for not escaping my '?' in my egrep. Then I have no idea why the OP got that as a hit. (02-27-2018, 06:29 PM)undeath Wrote: and a "normal" IPv4 representation does not have leading zeros "Normal" or not, they are accepted as perfectly valid in a variety of configurations and interfaces. Admittedly rare, but it's a thing. |