6.1.1 potfile - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: 6.1.1 potfile (/thread-9490.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: 6.1.1 potfile - philsmd - 09-24-2020 yeah, good that you guys pinpointed it. I didn't really look at the hash type, because thought you were just looking for the file in general. Yeah, but it already works like this since several years: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/3ad6fab63eed1f6b2cafe04b180b695015a043d4 (almost 2 years) https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/3dd89bc63c2614b57db58bd7b05d2d61dcc5ab75/src/modules/module_06211.c#L94 There are multiple hash types that do not have potfile support: Code: $ grep -rl 'potfile_disable = true' src/modules/ | sort -u RE: 6.1.1 potfile - royce - 09-24-2020 Huh - when I did my veracrypt testing in late 2018, it used the filename. This seems like the approach that would cause the least amount of confusion. Otherwise, we'll have a steady stream of users asking this question. https://www.techsolvency.com/passwords/hashcat-veracrypt/ https://www.techsolvency.com/passwords/hashcat-veracrypt/veracrypt.potfile Code: hashcat_ripemd160_aes_13711.vc:hashcat If reverting to this behavior is undesirable, maybe a warning shown to the screen for all potfile_disable formats? RE: 6.1.1 potfile - pbies - 09-24-2020 Can you share how the problem will be solved? RE: 6.1.1 potfile - philsmd - 09-24-2020 Code: hashcat -m 6211 -a 3 -w 3 -o cracked.txt -i container.tc ?b?b?b RE: 6.1.1 potfile - royce - 09-25-2020 I've also opened an issue to explore improvements here: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/2554 |