![]() |
Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence (/thread-1201.html) |
RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - M@LIK - 05-28-2012 Hash-IT:: Add it. I couldn't script that rule in one command, so it is done in two : ) RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Hash-IT - 05-28-2012 Thank you, I just wasn't sure and didn't want Pixel to misunderstand. ![]() RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Pixel - 05-28-2012 (05-28-2012, 05:23 PM)Hash-IT Wrote: Thank you, I just wasn't sure and didn't want Pixel to misunderstand. Yes I feel stupid now, should of listen to what the sed god M@LIK said in the first place ![]() RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Hash-IT - 05-28-2012 Ha ha ! For fans of star wars, M@lik is a "SEDI" master !! ![]() RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Pixel - 05-28-2012 (05-28-2012, 05:31 PM)Hash-IT Wrote: Ha ha ! LOL ![]() RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Pixel - 05-28-2012 ok its do it again M@LIK Code: mp64.exe --start-at=BPAAAAAA --stop-at=BPZZZZZZ ?u?u?u?u?u?u?u?u | sed -f awesome_script.txt >B.txt These passwords slipped through BPAABCED BPAABCEF BPAABCEG BPAABCEH BPAABCEI BPAABCEJ and in the text file is Code: /\(.\)\1\1/d RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Hash-IT - 05-28-2012 Well done Pixel, you are a good beta tester ! When this code is sorted we will have to talk about which one of us is generating which parts. ![]() RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Pixel - 05-28-2012 (05-28-2012, 07:19 PM)Hash-IT Wrote: Well done Pixel, you are a good beta tester ! Also do need it each character in one chunk or in several smaller chunks? RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Hash-IT - 05-28-2012 When the codes ready I think we could just post here which we are doing, so for example you could say you wanted to do A,B and C and I could do D,E and F... They do need to be in individual letters I think, I wouldn't split them further than that. RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence - Pixel - 05-28-2012 (05-28-2012, 07:29 PM)Hash-IT Wrote: They do need to be in individual letters I think, I wouldn't split them further than that. ok, but doesn't hashcat-plus read the whole file before it starts for stats or something. it would take abit to read a whole 65-75GB? (depending on the filter) |