hashcat Forum
oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html)
+--- Thread: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks (/thread-1026.html)

Pages: 1 2 3

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - M@LIK - 03-30-2012

(03-30-2012, 11:42 PM)atom Wrote: http://www.gat3way.eu/est.php

cool.. thanks : )

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - kigg - 04-07-2012

(03-30-2012, 10:48 PM)villers Wrote: C:\Users\Ghota\Desktop\exploit\md5\hashcat-gui-0.5.1\oclHashcat-lite>cudaHashcat
-lite64.exe 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe
cudaHashcat-lite v0.9 by atom starting...

GPU-Loops: 256
GPU-Accel: 80
Password lengths range: 1 - 55
Platform: NVidia compatible platform found
Watchdog: Temperature limit set to 90c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 680, 2048MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU
Device #2: GeForce GTX 680, 2048MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU
ERROR: ./kernels/4318/m0000q_warp.sm_30.64.cubin: No such file or directory

Why the tools doesn't works whit my new graphics card

I have the same problem. Any solutions yet?

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - atom - 04-07-2012

actually you can blame amd. because they do not fix their drivers i can not release the new oclHashcat-plus which already supports gtx680

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - kigg - 04-07-2012

(04-07-2012, 05:16 PM)atom Wrote: actually you can blame amd. because they do not fix their drivers i can not release the new oclHashcat-plus which already supports gtx680

Thanks for the information. Are you expecting the fixing from AMD in the near future?

Off topic: Damn, I have to crack ~570 really hard MD5 hashes this weekend.

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - K9 - 04-08-2012

wow the gtx680 for 500€ has similar speed than my old ati 4870 which is available at ebay for 5-50€

[Image: 3ttkC.jpg]

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - kigg - 04-08-2012

(04-08-2012, 03:28 PM)K9_ Wrote: wow the gtx680 for 500€ has similar speed than my old ati 4870 which is available at ebay for 5-50€

[Image: 3ttkC.jpg]

I think it is like this because the code isn't optimised for the new 28nm cards.

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - undeath - 04-08-2012

(04-08-2012, 07:33 PM)kigg Wrote: I think it is like this because the code isn't optimised for the new 28nm cards.

It is, and has always been, because Nvidia cards suck at GPGPU.

[Image: 3ttkC.jpg]

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - splash_ - 04-25-2012

(04-08-2012, 11:34 PM)undeath Wrote:
(04-08-2012, 07:33 PM)kigg Wrote: I think it is like this because the code isn't optimised for the new 28nm cards.

It is, and has always been, because Nvidia cards suck at GPGPU.

[Image: 3ttkC.jpg]

Really? I was going to buy 2 x GTX 680. Would it be better to hit the HD 7970 instead?

I'm particularly interested on md5crypt benchmarks on these two graphic cards but I didn't find any so far.

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - K9 - 04-25-2012

I'd say yes. ATI is faster and cheaper than nvidia.

RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - atom - 04-25-2012

The gtx680 is at 760 khash/s (estimated)
The hd7970 is at 3200 khash/s (latest beta)