number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-28.html) +--- Thread: number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type (/thread-10924.html) |
number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type - joe123 - 08-06-2022 Hello forum would like to find out how many passwords Hashcat has to test for following password with the following mask: - the password does consist in; a-zA-Z0-9 and (the following 3 chars) - _ & (are that in total 65 chars ?) - max password length: 10 chars Content of mask.file: ?l?u?d-_&,?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 Command: hashcat -m1000 -a3 -O -w3 --increment hash.txt mask.file (Thank's to user Snoopy who helped me to craft this mask Could somebody please explain me how to calculate the number of required attemps? Thank you very much! Joe RE: number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type - b8vr - 08-06-2022 With 65 chars and up to 10 char long password, there will be 65^10 (or 1,34627433E+18) options. So.... a lot!!! RE: number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type - wallacebw - 08-07-2022 Not perfect, but a good tool to ballpark generic keyspaces. https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm as b8vr stated for you it is: [a-z] = 26 + [A-Z] = 26 + [0-9] = 10 + - _ & = 3 ----------------------- 26+26+10+3 = 65 charset = 65 pw length = 10 ----------------------- keyspace = 65^10 65^10 = 1,346,274,334,462,890,625 = 1.346274334×10¹⁸ RE: number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type - DanielG - 08-08-2022 And to put it into perspective, using a NVIDIA RTX 3080 TI card, and assuming it can maintain a steady 117.4 GH/s speed means: 1,346,274,334,462,890,625 / 117,400,000,000 = 133 days of full time 24 hours per day cracking to go through them all. RE: number of attemps with a mask for a NTLM hash type - joe123 - 08-08-2022 Thank's a lot to each of you for your feedback! Unfortunately I can't afford to setup an adequate lab for such a task |