BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - Printable Version

BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes (/thread-1207.html)

BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - NeonFlash - 05-24-2012

Is Bruteforce mode not available for SMF hashes?

Code:
oclHashcat-plus32.exe -m 121 -n 160 -a 3 --remove -o crackedSMF.txt Forum.txt ?l?l?l?l?l ?l?l?l?l

I get the usage error by oclHashcat-plus32.exe which prints out an error telling how to use it.

RE: BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - M@LIK - 05-24-2012

It does.
Use one mask at the end:

Code:
oclHashcat-plus32.exe -m 121 -n 160 -a 3 --remove -o crackedSMF.txt Forum.txt ?l?l?l?l?l

RE: BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - NeonFlash - 05-24-2012

Thank you. I was using the oclhashcat syntax.

Just to reconfirm. Does the concept of left and right masks no longer hold good?

I also noticed that the options such as:

-j
-k
--increment

are not available. They were quite useful.

RE: BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - undeath - 05-24-2012

yes, this is all correct. Increment mode will be available with the next version again.

RE: BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes - NeonFlash - 05-24-2012

Hello,

Thanks for confirming. Would be great to see these options back.