hybrid attack vs. custom rules: massive performance divergence/performance optimizati - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: hybrid attack vs. custom rules: massive performance divergence/performance optimizati (/thread-12156.html) |
hybrid attack vs. custom rules: massive performance divergence/performance optimizati - fsdafsadfsdsdaf - 09-13-2024 Hey there, this week I started experiments with hybrid attacks and maskprocessor and I am confused by the results. I have a wordlist that itself takes about 7 minutes. I added 1 to 3 digits to every word using a) hybrid attack and b) a custom rule created with maskprocessor. suprisingly the runtime was very different. hybrid attack took ~25 minutes (so dominated by 3*7min read time of the wordlist), the custom-rule based version was reported to take about 6 days, even though the rule engine is on gpu and should be very efficient and only read the wordlist once instead of 3 times. If I try to append 4 digits, the custom rule even fails because 8 GB of VRAM seem to be insufficient - as a hybrid attack takes 45 minutes to append 4 digits. questions: 1) why is the rule-based version so slow? 2) are there general rules or rules of thumb of when to use hybrid attacks and when to use custom rule 3) --increment does start 4 separate attacks after each other, which required the list to be read 3 times. Is there a way to combine these attacks to a single (hybrid attack) run? Thank you |