+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-21.html)
+--- Thread: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? (/thread-122.html)
Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - decoy5657 - 09-03-2010
Does anyone have some domain cached credential benchmarks to share?
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - Rolf - 09-03-2010
Yes!
Fresh from the oven.
![[Image: dccoclhc.png]](http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/9315/dccoclhc.png)
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - decoy5657 - 09-03-2010
I need a GPU. CPU processing gives me 6.09m/sec. Hahahaha....
is it against the rules to ask for outsourced hash cracking here?
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - Rolf - 09-03-2010
Yes, we dont crack hashes here.
Google for InsidePro or Hashkiller, there you can get help.
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - decoy5657 - 09-03-2010
cool.... 6.09 to 454. Still impressive. 74 times faster. woot.
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - arnbju - 09-13-2010
A GTS250 Does about 225M/s and a 8600GT about 45M/s
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - Rolf - 09-13-2010
Yes, AMD's gfx card's int. performance is higher than NV's, they support crypto-useful bit align, and they dont artificially limit dp fp perf by 4.
Oh, and they're cheaper.
RE: Domain Cached Credentials benchmarks? - D3ad0ne - 10-01-2010
Hmm, these are a bit harder.
Code:
root@ubuntu:~/oclHashcat-0.24# ./oclHashcat64.bin -m1100 -n160 -o dcc.out dcc -1 ?l?d?u?s ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1
./oclHashcat64.bin: /usr/lib/libOpenCL.so: no version information available (required by ./oclHashcat64.bin)
oclHashcat v0.24 starting...
Digests: 1 entries, 1 unique
Salts: 1 entries, 1 unique
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Platforms: 1
Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation, OpenCL 1.0 CUDA 3.1.1 (6 matched)
Device #1: GeForce GTX 480, 1535MB, 1504Mhz, 15MCU
Device #1: Kernel kernels/4318/m1100q.kernel (46372 bytes)
Device #2: GeForce GTX 480, 1535MB, 1504Mhz, 15MCU
Device #2: Kernel kernels/4318/m1100q.kernel (46372 bytes)
Device #3: GeForce GTX 480, 1535MB, 1504Mhz, 15MCU
Device #3: Kernel kernels/4318/m1100q.kernel (46372 bytes)
Device #4: GeForce GTX 480, 1535MB, 1504Mhz, 15MCU
Device #4: Kernel kernels/4318/m1100q.kernel (46372 bytes)
Device #5: GeForce GTX 480, 1535MB, 1504Mhz, 15MCU
Device #5: Kernel kernels/4318/m1100q.kernel (46372 bytes)
Device #6: GeForce GTX 480, 1535MB, 1504Mhz, 15MCU
Device #6: Kernel kernels/4318/m1100q.kernel (46372 bytes)
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [h]elp [q]uit => s
Threads...: 6
Mode.Left.: Mask '?1?1?1?1' (81450625)
Mode.Right: Mask '?1?1?1' (857375)
Speed.GPU1: 875.3M/s (running)
Speed.GPU2: 875.4M/s (running)
Speed.GPU3: 875.4M/s (running)
Speed.GPU4: 875.4M/s (running)
Speed.GPU5: 875.4M/s (running)
Speed.GPU6: 875.4M/s (running)
Speed.GPU*: 5252.3M/s
Recovered.: 0/1 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress..: 34917580800/69833729609375 (0.05%)
Running...: 6 secs
Estimated.: 3 hours, 41 mins
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [h]elp [q]uit =>