oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack

oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Feature Requests (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack (/thread-1268.html)

oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - M@LIK - 06-10-2012

Hello, I want to request the support of incremental-bruteforce while using the hybrid attack.

Instead of:

Code:
-a6 %dict% ?d?d

-a6 %dict% ?d?d?d

-a6 %dict% ?d?d?d?d

-a6 %dict% ?d?d?d?d?d

One cute line:

Code:
-a6 %dict% --hy-min=2 ?d?d?d?d?d

Sounds good?

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - epixoip - 06-10-2012

I just found myself wishing for this an hour ago.

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - undeath - 06-10-2012

sounds very useful

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - atom - 06-11-2012

This is very hard to implement. More demand?

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - Hash-IT - 06-13-2012

(06-11-2012, 09:36 AM)atom Wrote: This is very hard to implement. More demand?

Well, I would never "demand" anything Smile

However I think M@LIK has had a good idea there.

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - proinside - 06-15-2012

A batch file with those lines doesn't give the same results ?

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - M@LIK - 06-15-2012

@proinside:: It does, but I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - blazer - 06-15-2012

err. I'm currently achieving this by using a loop.

:Label

-a6 %dict% %mask%

%mask% =%mask%?d

Goto label....

Problem solved I reckon. Saves atom a ton of time.

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - M@LIK - 06-15-2012

@blazer:: That's not really a smart idea. And again:

M@LIK Wrote: ...I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.

RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack - proinside - 06-15-2012

Quote:It does, but I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.

Yes, I see and agree with your point of view.
At least, every new batch line requires the same dictionaire to be scanned,
even if it is faster, but it is in fact a waste of time, energy and, perhaps,
other things.