![]() |
Output Bug Report - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Output Bug Report (/thread-1425.html) |
Output Bug Report - oxaners - 08-03-2012 A bug has come to my attention during my recent testing. It is limited to -plus and seems to work fine on -lite (haven't tested CPU). Basically, when using a hex charset and including x00, the plaintext output, in hex, will be truncated by dropping everything after and including the first x00. I have a couple sample outputs below: oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 100 -a 3 --force --outfile-format=5 --hex-charset -1 000102030405060708 cbe4c12958ab208cba48401c53ecd9ff63f76e68 ?1?1?1?1?1 oclHashcat-plus v0.08 by atom starting... cbe4c12958ab208cba48401c53ecd9ff63f76e68:0603 Status.......: Cracked Input.Mode...: Mask (?1?1?1?1?1) Hash.Target..: cbe4c12958ab208cba48401c53ecd9ff63f76e68 Hash.Type....: SHA1 The output should look like the one from -lite: oclHashcat-lite64.exe -m 100 --outfile-format=5 --hex-charset -1 000102030405060708 cbe4c12958ab208cba48401c53ecd9ff63f76e68 ?1?1?1?1?1 oclHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting... cbe4c12958ab208cba48401c53ecd9ff63f76e68:0603000102 Status.......: Cracked Hash.Target..: cbe4c12958ab208cba48401c53ecd9ff63f76e68 Hash.Type....: SHA1 Plain.Mask...: ?1?1?1?1?1 RE: Output Bug Report - atom - 08-03-2012 Looks interessting. Someone can reproduce I am a bit busy coding sun-md5. RE: Output Bug Report - oxaners - 09-07-2012 Just checking to see if anyone has had a chance to reproduce this? Currently my workaround is to just send the -plus cracked hash to -lite if it's found, with the proper mask and re-crack ![]() RE: Output Bug Report - M@LIK - 09-07-2012 I believe it's fixed I reported something very similar. RE: Output Bug Report - atom - 09-07-2012 Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html Thread closed |