![]() |
DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Developer (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-39.html) +--- Forum: Beta Tester (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-31.html) +--- Thread: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug (/thread-1678.html) |
DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - M@LIK - 10-22-2012 This is a bug report related to descrypt (-m1500) on CPU's hashcat only. Whenever the flag\s --remove OR\AND -o is\are set while attacking descrypt list, hashcat messes the original hashfile OR\AND the outfile up... very badly. It increases the last character value in the hash by two: Code: hashfile: // eight valid descrypt hashes, four only have an actual password Note that some hashes remain intact, don't ask me why. But all the other hashes undergo an awful alteration causing them to be invalid and un-crackable. This bug seems to have complicated results, but I'm not discussing it any further cause I'm pretty sure it's all about one flaw. RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - atom - 10-22-2012 CPU hashcat does not support DEScrypt RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - atom - 10-22-2012 Moved the thread to beta section RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - M@LIK - 10-22-2012 Haha, this just got worse. hashcat-cli64.exe from https://hashcat.net/files/hashcat-0.41.7z is happy to crack any des hash using -m1500. Folks, please welcome the new hidden algos... NOTE: All my tests were done on hashcat-0.41. hashcat-0.42b1 has the bug too, but with different results. RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - blandyuk - 10-22-2012 I tested it with these 2, obviously minus the passwords: neCYnaUa.vV4c:dragon neS7QCdrq4MGM:cookie Found them both, (obviously), and did not mess the hashes up. Does this only happen with lots of DES hashes? RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - M@LIK - 10-22-2012 As I mentioned: M@LIK Wrote: Note that some hashes remain intact, don't ask me why. Mostly the outfile is the victim. And, yes, I also noticed nothing happens with two hashes. Try with, say, 20 hashes, make sure that 10 at least remain uncracked and use --remove and -o. RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - atom - 10-23-2012 Its correct I did not disable the module so that it stays hidden. Thats why I moved this thread into beta so that the public does not see it since its not working as it should. That why I take no bug reports on it, sorry. RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug - M@LIK - 10-23-2012 That sounds a bit awkward. It explains a lot though. Anyways, sorry, I did not mean to spoil this. Waiting for this getting officially supported. |