+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html)
+--- Forum: General Help (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit (/thread-1722.html)
Pages:
1
2
Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - john99 - 11-03-2012
Hello
under http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/ the following is written:
- Worlds fastest md5crypt, phpass, mscash2 and WPA / WPA2 cracker
I always believed that Pyrit is the fastest WPA cracker.. hmm or do I miss something?
Thanks a lot for any feedback!
John
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - undeath - 11-03-2012
you missed oclhashcat-plus
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - Mem5 - 11-03-2012
@john99 : do a benchmark
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - forumhero - 11-03-2012
pyrit cannot scale well. for example on 4xhd5970
___________________________________
root@forumhero:~# pyrit benchmark
Pyrit 0.4.1-dev (svn r308) © 2008-2011 Lukas Lueg http://pyrit.googlecode.com
This code is distributed under the GNU General Public License v3+
Running benchmark (212490.9 PMKs/s)... /
Computed 212490.94 PMKs/s total.
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 45331.5 PMKs/s (RTT 1.1)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #2 'ATI CYPRESS'': 44875.4 PMKs/s (RTT 1.1)
#3: 'CAL++ Device #3 'ATI CYPRESS'': 42802.6 PMKs/s (RTT 1.2)
#4: 'CAL++ Device #4 'ATI CYPRESS'': 47091.5 PMKs/s (RTT 1.1)
#5: 'CAL++ Device #5 'ATI CYPRESS'': 46334.9 PMKs/s (RTT 1.1)
#6: 'CAL++ Device #6 'ATI CYPRESS'': 48434.4 PMKs/s (RTT 1.0)
#7: 'CAL++ Device #7 'ATI CYPRESS'': 47269.8 PMKs/s (RTT 1.0)
#8: 'CAL++ Device #8 'ATI CYPRESS'': 44552.3 PMKs/s (RTT 1.1)
#9: 'CPU-Core (SSE2/AES)': 814.5 PMKs/s (RTT 3.0)
#10: 'CPU-Core (SSE2/AES)': 823.2 PMKs/s (RTT 2.9)
#11: 'CPU-Core (SSE2/AES)': 812.5 PMKs/s (RTT 2.9)
#12: 'CPU-Core (SSE2/AES)': 820.5 PMKs/s (RTT 2.9)
___________________________________
oclhashcat
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Status..: Running
Input.Mode...: File (/bigwordlist.txt)
Hash.Target..: linksys
Hash.Type....: WPA/WPA2
Time.Running.: 40 secs
Time.Left....: 26 mins, 49 secs
Time.Util....: 40155.3ms/1624.3ms Real/CPU, 4.2% idle
Speed..: 554.9k c/s Real, 567.3k c/s GPU
Recovered....: 0/1 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress..: 22494860/914133014 (2.46%)
Rejected..: 212620/22494860 (0.95%)
HW.Monitor.#1: 88% GPU, 62c Temp
HW.Monitor.#2: 88% GPU, 63c Temp
HW.Monitor.#3: 88% GPU, 64c Temp
HW.Monitor.#4: 88% GPU, 63c Temp
HW.Monitor.#5: 88% GPU, 64c Temp
HW.Monitor.#6: 88% GPU, 62c Temp
HW.Monitor.#7: 88% GPU, 61c Temp
HW.Monitor.#8: 88% GPU, 61c Temp
pyrit = 212k/s
hashcat 550k/s
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - atom - 11-03-2012
Do not forget the magical "--gpu-loops 4096 -n 32" parameter set for WPA
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - Mem5 - 11-04-2012
@atom: This magical option does not speed up the crack for me.
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - atom - 11-05-2012
Its depending on GPU. Its mostly efficient on AMD, at most at hd7970. Not much of a difference on NV.
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - john99 - 11-07-2012
Thank's a lot for the feedback! Does that mean, hashcat-plus is even faster than Pyrit with its precomputed tables???
Thank you!
John
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - epixoip - 11-07-2012
correct, it means that plus is over 2x faster than pyrit with its precomputed tables.
RE: Speed of Hascat vs Pyrit - john99 - 11-17-2012
(11-03-2012, 05:29 PM)forumhero Wrote: pyrit cannot scale well. for example on 4xhd5970
Does pyrit not scale well, because for every GPU a CPU is required (that is at least my understanding)?
John