![]() |
Simple Scan - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-21.html) +--- Thread: Simple Scan (/thread-190.html) |
Simple Scan - Street - 11-21-2010 Hi all! I'm new to oclHashCat as i've just bought a ATI Radeon HD 5870 and have been using InsidePro's EGB but doesn't support ATI. I'm having great difficulty doing a basic scan with my wordlists. I just want to scan my wordlists with nothing added/changed. Could someone show me a command line to do a basic scan with a wordlist? Would be much appreciated as i've been trying all types of different things. ![]() RE: Simple Scan - Rolf - 11-22-2010 OCLHC is designed for bruteforcing, mask and combination attacks. It is not designed to run simple wordlist attacks. RE: Simple Scan - Street - 11-22-2010 Aww man! I'm gutted. ![]() Cheers for letting me know. RE: Simple Scan - D3ad0ne - 11-22-2010 Street, best method for a simple dictionary attack is to use regular hashcat in dictionary mode. If your using windows it would be: Code: hashcat-0.30.exe hashlist.txt /dict Where /dict contains all your dictionary files. Likewise with oclhashcat you could do this: Code: oclHashcat.exe hashlist.txt -j ] -1 ?l?u?s?d?h dictionary.dic ?1 RE: Simple Scan - Street - 11-22-2010 (11-22-2010, 04:47 AM)D3ad0ne Wrote: Street, best method for a simple dictionary attack is to use regular hashcat in dictionary mode. If your using windows it would be: Thanks d3ad0ne, i'm gonna try that out. You're pro! ![]() RE: Simple Scan - Street - 11-22-2010 Works like a charm! Thank you d3ad0ne, you've made me happy! ![]() RE: Simple Scan - Rabbitz - 11-24-2010 Or just use hashcat gui! RE: Simple Scan - Tommie_c - 11-24-2010 That's what I do as well. Whenever I want to use word lists I use the GUI and if I need to make changes to the list I write a rule to modify the list. RE: Simple Scan - atom - 01-31-2011 for single dictionary based attack use new oclHashcat+ |