Does restore affect --gpu-accel? - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Does restore affect --gpu-accel? (/thread-2377.html) |
Does restore affect --gpu-accel? - PnkPanther - 06-17-2013 It seems restore remembers --gpu-accel settings. At default I was getting around 57,000 /s. I decided to lower accel to 4 which put me around 49,000 /s. After quiting and then restoring the session, speed seems to stay at 49,000 and 80% utilization even without a --gpu-accel parameter. oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2500 -d 1 -o rangerkey ranger.hccap g:\noname2 == 57,000 /s oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2500 -d 1 -n 4 -o rangerkey ranger.hccap g:\noname2 == 49,000 /s (QUIT) oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2500 -d 1 --restore -o rangerkey ranger.hccap g:\noname2 == 49,000 /s oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2500 -d 1 --restore -n 64 -o rangerkey ranger.hccap g:\noname2 == 49,000 /s Is this a coincidence or is it supposed to do that? RE: Does restore affect --gpu-accel? - PnkPanther - 06-17-2013 Nevermind, I see that restore does remember. Is there any way to change --gpu-accel and restore at the same time? c:\oclHashcat-plus-0.14>oclHashcat-plus64.exe -d 1 -n 40 --restore oclHashcat-plus v0.14 by atom starting... Hashes: 1 total, 1 unique salts, 1 unique digests Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes Rules: 1 Workload: 16 loops, 4 accel Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c Device #1: Barts, 1024MB, 900Mhz, 14MCU Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m2500.Barts_1084.4_1084.4 (VM).kernel (1787596 bytes) Cache-hit dictionary stats g:\noname2: 11086705932 bytes, 992570634 words, 99257 0634 keyspaceWARN: ADL_Overdrive5_FanSpeedInfo_Get(): -1 RE: Does restore affect --gpu-accel? - atom - 06-17-2013 No you can't change it afterwards, sorry. RE: Does restore affect --gpu-accel? - PnkPanther - 06-17-2013 Okay, thanks. |