hashcat Forum
-1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat (/thread-2513.html)



-1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - cudanoob - 08-12-2013

I've been looking around to see if anyone else is having the same issue as me for a while now with no success. Im running Ubuntu 12.04 with 2 geforce 9500 gts and when I run cudahashcat on a EPA my gpus are showing a -1% utilization. I checked tuner my nvidia settings and seen that one gpu is running at 20% and the other at 2%. Why is it showing -1% and only cracking at a combined speed of 3400/s? And I have also noticed that my gpu is being autotuneddown to 1.


RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - epixoip - 08-12-2013

not sure about why it's reporting -1%, but all the other issues (autotuned to 1, low utilization) indicate you are not giving it enough work to do.


RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - cudanoob - 08-12-2013

(08-12-2013, 03:28 AM)epixoip Wrote: not sure about why it's reporting -1%, but all the other issues (autotuned to 1, low utilization) indicate you are not giving it enough work to do.

Could I be putting the command in wrong? Here's what I'm putting in. ./cudaHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500 -r rules/best64.rule /home/ninjabox/test.hccap /path to word list.txt


RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - atom - 08-12-2013

The -1% means that the API provided by nvidia does not allow the reading of the GPU utilization. This is not oclHashcat-*'s fault, blame nvidia.

The utilization is like epixoip said, you're not providing enough work. Make sure you have enough entries in your wordlist (multiple millions). Also try adding -u 4096


RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - cudanoob - 08-13-2013

That helped a little bit thank you. Could my drivers be keeping me from cracking faster? Or is it just that wpa is so much slower than md5?


RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - atom - 08-14-2013

Yes, WPA is A LOT slower than raw MD5 Smile

See benchmark tables to get an idea: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/#performance


RE: -1% utilization issue with cudahashcat - cudanoob - 08-14-2013

That confirms my thoughts about a new pair of graphic cards. Thank you.