+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: Big hash list problem (/thread-2547.html)
Big hash list problem - Neusbeer1 - 08-25-2013
Ey guys,
Just updated to 0.15
and now when trying to bruteforce a big list
(+5mil hashes) it gives an error and exits.
(this was good in 0.14, but I updated because I liked the +15 passwords)
===
oclHashcat-plus v0.15 by atom starting...
Hashes: 5743744 total, 1 unique salts, 5743744 unique digests
Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
Rules: 1
Workload: 128 loops, 80 accel
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 80c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: BeaverCreek, 512MB, 444Mhz, 4MCU
Device #2: Caicos, 1024MB, 444Mhz, 2MCU
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0100_a0.BeaverCreek_1124.2_1124.2 (VM).kernel (982864 bytes)
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.BeaverCreek_1124.2_1124.2 (VM).kernel (33872 bytes)
ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
RE: Big hash list problem - User - 08-25-2013
Reduce the number of hashes per file / split the hashset into two files and everything will work ok.
RE: Big hash list problem - Neusbeer1 - 08-25-2013
sure, but then I have to bruteforce twice (If I split it up in 2) or triple scan when split in 3 files.
will take me much much longer (added days of scanning time then).
I use a large hashlist for testing my dicts and rulesets and markov.
And before 0.15 it worked fine. still, no harm done, just pointing it out.
RE: Big hash list problem - epixoip - 08-26-2013
GPU #1 does not have enough video memory to handle that many hashes with the new version.
RE: Big hash list problem - undeath - 08-26-2013
I thought the new version generally uses less memory?
RE: Big hash list problem - epixoip - 08-26-2013
less host memory, not less device memory.
RE: Big hash list problem - Neusbeer1 - 08-26-2013
Thnxs for the answer. so, need better card.. lol..
too bad it won't use both memory.
RE: Big hash list problem - epixoip - 08-27-2013
it does use the memory on both cards, but it does so independently of course.