Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) (/thread-2569.html) |
Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - helloworld - 08-29-2013 I use 2*gtx690, result as below: •PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 / AES: 95.6kHash/s •PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 / AES: 130 kHash/s •PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool / AES: 30 kHash/s *updated* •PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 boot-mode / AES: 187 kHash/s Comparison of the results of the official release: Here are some speeds from 2x hd6990: •PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 / AES: 223 kHash/s •PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 / AES: 95 kHash/s •PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool / AES: 49 kHash/s *updated* •PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 boot-mode / AES: 451 kHash/s I think two result difference is large, Is there the results of the official about gtx690? thank you! RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - radix - 08-29-2013 nvidia is bad, pretty much the official word RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - atom - 08-29-2013 AMD has both more raw power and a the better integer instruction set (floating-point doesn't matter) and thus it's better for crypto, since crypto only uses integer instructions. That's the reason why its generally faster than NV in crypto. But, AMD has bad support for 64 bit instructions or at least worse support than NV. This makes it bad when it comes to 64 bit based algorithms, such as SHA512. RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - Rolf - 08-29-2013 Here are the results for a single GTX Titan. -m 6211: 74015 -m 6212: 33988 -m 6213: 10592 Price: £800 Radeon 7970. -m 6211: 59108 -m 6212: 25180 -m 6213: 12987 Price: £319 MAD is far from losing I would say. RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - jb_bak - 08-29-2013 Is this about right for 4 7970s? Should I even mess with overclocking? I do have them watercooled. Session.Name...: oclHashcat-lite Status.........: Aborted Hash.Target....: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: Thu Aug 29 10:44:43 2013 (2 mins, 57 secs) Time.Estimated.: Mon Sep 2 22:05:30 2013 (4 days, 11 hours) Plain.Mask.....: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 Plain.Text.....: ***0gwMER Plain.Length...: 9 Progress.......: 6226247680000/13537086546263552 (0.05%) Speed.GPU.#1...: 8938.2M/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 8938.1M/s Speed.GPU.#3...: 8205.3M/s Speed.GPU.#4...: 8948.3M/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 35029.8M/s HWMon.GPU.#1...: 94% Util, 41c Temp, 20% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2...: 95% Util, 41c Temp, 20% Fan HWMon.GPU.#3...: 96% Util, 43c Temp, 20% Fan HWMon.GPU.#4...: 99% Util, 41c Temp, 20% Fan RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690) - Rolf - 08-29-2013 use -n 800 -u 4096 |