+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Developer (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Beta Tester (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-31.html)
+--- Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ... (/thread-2583.html)
v1.00 beta 11 ... - atom - 09-03-2013
... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.
happy testing!!
RE: v1.00 beta 11 ... - mastercracker - 09-03-2013
(09-03-2013, 01:41 PM)atom Wrote: ... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.Ok. A bit more info is welcomed. Does it trigger these kernels by itself when there is only 1 hash left AND that the attack is bruteforcing? Otherwise, it's just that you plan to use it as lite and design the command-line accordingly?
happy testing!!
RE: v1.00 beta 11 ... - atom - 09-03-2013
Yes, when you use only 1 hash and brute-force mode
RE: v1.00 beta 11 ... - forumhero - 09-06-2013
crashes for me if i have single hash in hast.list, but works ok if i use the examp0.hash list
root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00# ./oclHashcat64.bin example0.hash example.dict
oclHashcat, advanced password recovery
Hashes: 6494 total, 1 unique salts, 6494 unique digests
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes
Rules: 1
Workload: 256 loops, 80 accel
Applicable Optimizers:
* Zero-Bits
* Precompute-Init
* Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
* Meet-In-The-Middle
* Early-Skip
* Not-Salted
* Not-Iterated
* Single-Salt
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #2: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #3: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #4: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #5: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #6: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel not found in cache! Building may take a while...
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel not found in cache! Building may take a while...
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
Device #3: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #3: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
Device #4: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #4: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
Device #5: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #5: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
Device #6: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #6: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
WARN: ADL_Overdrive5_FanSpeedInfo_Get(): -1
Generated dictionary stats for example.dict: 1210228 bytes, 129988 words, 129988 keyspace
NOTE: autotuned --gpu-accel from 80 to 8
e11c594e6a2f4eb499cceadfca988595:13LEXON
Session.Name...: oclHashcat
Status.........: Exhausted
Input.Mode.....: File (example.dict)
Hash.Target....: File (example0.hash)
Hash.Type......: MD5
Time.Started...: 0 secs
Time.Estimated.: 0 secs
Speed.GPU.#1...: 4656.2 kH/s
Speed.GPU.#2...: 10417.5 kH/s
Speed.GPU.#3...: 8864.5 kH/s
Speed.GPU.#4...: 0 H/s
Speed.GPU.#5...: 0 H/s
Speed.GPU.#6...: 0 H/s
Speed.GPU.#*...: 23938.2 kH/s
Recovered......: 1/6494 (0.02%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.......: 129988/129988 (100.00%)
Rejected.......: 0/129988 (0.00%)
HWMon.GPU.#1...: 0% Util, 53c Temp, N/A Fan
HWMon.GPU.#2...: 0% Util, 54c Temp, N/A Fan
HWMon.GPU.#3...: 0% Util, 54c Temp, N/A Fan
HWMon.GPU.#4...: 0% Util, 55c Temp, N/A Fan
HWMon.GPU.#5...: 0% Util, 56c Temp, N/A Fan
HWMon.GPU.#6...: 0% Util, 54c Temp, N/A Fan
Started: Thu Sep 5 21:12:26 2013
Stopped: Thu Sep 5 21:12:44 2013
root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00# echo e11c594e6a2f4eb499cceadfca988595 > test.md5
root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00# ./oclHashcat64.bin test.md5 example.dict
oclHashcat v1.00 starting...
Hashes: 1 total, 1 unique salts, 1 unique digests
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Rules: 1
Workload: 256 loops, 80 accel
Applicable Optimizers:
* Zero-Bits
* Precompute-Init
* Precompute-Merkle-Demgard
* Meet-In-The-Middle
* Early-Skip
* Not-Salted
* Not-Iterated
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #2: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #3: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #4: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #5: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #6: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes)
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes)
ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46
root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00#
RE: v1.00 beta 11 ... - atom - 09-06-2013
OK, I will fix this, but the difference is only to see in brute-force as oclHashcat-lite is a brute-force only cracker. So you will only see a difference with single MD5 and NTLM hashes in brute-force. Also, please don't call it a crash when it's not
RE: v1.00 beta 11 ... - atom - 09-06-2013
ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46 will be fixed in b16