+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Developer (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Beta Tester (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-31.html)
+--- Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat (/thread-2865.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - epixoip - 11-26-2013
(11-26-2013, 10:12 PM)proinside Wrote: -o pass.found is the file were the cracked hashes should be stored.
yes, i understand this. i'm asking why you've chosen to put it in that location, between the arguments.
(11-26-2013, 10:15 PM)atom Wrote: getops allows the usage of -o between two arguments
i'm surprised to hear that it does. bad form none the less.
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - proinside - 11-26-2013
(11-26-2013, 10:21 PM)epixoip Wrote: i'm asking why you've chosen to put it in that location, between the arguments.
Convenience or laziness, I guess. It seems to work not only there.
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - atom - 11-26-2013
There's a new .exe at http://hashcat.net/beta
Please replace with the existing one and try again.
I can't test since I do not have access to windows system right now.
It's possible that it will not work, but it's worth a try
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - proinside - 11-26-2013
Fixed atom ! Tks