+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html)
+--- Forum: Old hashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-20.html)
+--- Thread: Not sure; Bug or Me?? (/thread-296.html)
Not sure; Bug or Me?? - Tommie_c - 02-15-2011
I am now using HC 0.35 with GUI 0.2.453, when I noticed the first problem I was using 0.2.433 and now the problem is solved but I'll mention it anyway.
I have a rule i call DandF, (duplicate and reflect). Problem was, Dick worked fine but Fred didn't see any action. No matter how I wrote the rule it wouldn't reflect but it does in the new version so problem solved. Just thought i'd mention it. On too a second observation;
here's a few example PW's;
Amistad[6
Athens`1
Atlan`ta1
Be)aumont1
Berkel~ey1
Buffalo|1
Buffal~o1
Letmein}2
So I'm using a word list, (that hopefully has these words in it
), and the ported korelogic rule: Append1_AddSpecialEverywhere.rule and notice it has only 8 special chr's in it. So I write my own rule and call it: Append1_AddALLSpecialEverywhere.rule and include the other 24 chr's.I also write the other digs in separate rule files, eg; append 0 add ALL,
Append 2 add ALL and so on. great now i can get the Amistad[6 and also the Letmein}2, NOT so!!! Here's where the fun starts. Any password that DOESN"T have the special just before the appended number, eg Atlan`ta1 Be)aumont1 Berkel~ey1 Buffal~o1 the rules work on But if the special is right before the number eg Amistad[6 Athens`1 Buffalo|1 Letmein}2 the rules don't work. I have worked around this by writing other rules like my AppendALLSpecialNum.rule but was wondering why it won't work when I'm using the other rules. Also I think it used to work with the Append1AddSpecialEverywhere.rule but am not positive, (possibly I just didn't notice it at first being fairly new to HC). Here's an example of the KL rule, and then an example of mine:
KLAppend1_AddSpecialEverywhere.rule:
>5ci0!$1
>5ci0@$1
>5ci0$$1
>5ci0#$1
>5ci1!$1
>5ci1@$1
>5ci1$$1
>5ci1#$1
>5ci2!$1
>5ci2@$1
>5ci2$$1
>5ci2#$1
>5ci3!$1
Now my version: (I left out the 5 or larger, and the cap cause i use 2 lists, 1 lower case and 1 caps, and also want to use 3 and 4 chr words). It's not a mistake, I did it on purpose.
i0!$1
i0@$1
i0#$1
i0$$1
i0%$1
i0^$1
i0&$1
i0*$1.....
.....
i1!$1
i1@$1
i1#$1
i1$$1
i1%$1
i1^$1
i1&$1
i1*$1
i1($1
.....
i8"$1
i8,$1
i8.$1
i8<$1
i8>$1
i8/$1
i8?$1
So here's the ? Is it me and my rules, or just the way the prog works??
thanks in advance for any answers.
RE: Not sure; Bug or Me?? - atom - 02-15-2011
nice catch, Tommie_c. its a bug and i have fixed it. if you are interessted in a fix beta PM me. fix log:
Quote:root@sf:~/hashcat-0.36# cat word
Amistad
Athens
Atlanta
Beaumont
Berkeley
Buffalo
Letmein
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.36# cat hash
196a90b67a841ff3
4d2feb1a206ca356
14561fc458dab351
1d2ffbe713c4a656
7a1ae0d80bbb43f4
0622a8526b2e1651
159288942bfcfbec
29e208971cca8e1f
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.36# /root/maskprocessor-0.64/mp64.bin 'i?d?s$?d' > rule
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.36# ./hashcat-cli64.bin -m 200 hash word -r rule
Initializing with 8 threads and 32mb segment-size...
NOTE: press enter for status-screen
Added hashes from file hash: 8 (1 salts)
Added rules from file rule: 3300
1d2ffbe713c4a656:Be)aumont1
14561fc458dab351:Atlan`ta1
4d2feb1a206ca356:Athens`1
196a90b67a841ff3:Amistad[6
7a1ae0d80bbb43f4:Berkel~ey1
159288942bfcfbec:Buffal~o1
0622a8526b2e1651:Buffalo|1
29e208971cca8e1f:Letmein}2
All hashes have been recovered