O H/sec with PhpBB - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: Old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-38.html) +--- Thread: O H/sec with PhpBB (/thread-3013.html) Pages:
1
2
|
O H/sec with PhpBB - Mem5 - 01-12-2014 Hi, Considering thousand of PHPBB hashes. I launched a dictionnary attack, I got ~400 H/sec. GPU : 7970. I then lauch a bruteforce attack on digits : Code: oclhashcat64.exe --remove -n 160 -u 8 -a 3 -m 400 -i --increment-min=1 --increment-max=12 -1 ?d phpbb.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 Session.Name...: oclHashcat Status.........: Running Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1) [1] Hash.Target....: File (phpbb.txt) Hash.Type......: phpass, MD5(Wordpress), MD5(phpBB3) Time.Started...: Sun Jan 12 22:02:18 2014 (1 min, 1 sec) Time.Estimated.: 0 secs Speed.GPU.#1...: 0 H/s Recovered......: 0/13681 (0.00%) Digests, 0/13681 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 44650/136810 (32.64%) Rejected.......: 0/44650 (0.00%) 1 digit : 0 H/sec. Why 0 H/sec ? Few minutes after : Session.Name...: oclHashcat Status.........: Running Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1?1) [2] Hash.Target....: File (phpbb.txt) Hash.Type......: phpass, MD5(Wordpress), MD5(phpBB3) Time.Started...: Sun Jan 12 22:02:18 2014 (30 secs) Time.Estimated.: Sun Jan 12 22:08:41 2014 (2 mins, 44 secs) Speed.GPU.#1...: 1 H/s Recovered......: 0/13681 (0.00%) Digests, 0/13681 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 219300/1368100 (16.03%) Rejected.......: 0/219300 (0.00%) 2 digits : 1 H/sec. Etc... 3 digits : 10 H/sec ; 4 digits 21 H/sec.. Am I doing something wrong with the command line ? Why dictionnary attack gives 400 H/sec but simple digit bruteforce is slower ? I tried changing -n and -u but this is the same. Thanks. RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - radix - 01-12-2014 take the tuning options off and see what happens. RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - Mem5 - 01-12-2014 It's the same without -n and -u RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - atom - 01-12-2014 to many salts RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - Mem5 - 01-13-2014 Does this imply a hashes limit ? I should divide the list in 2 or 3 or more ? RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - epixoip - 01-13-2014 for salted algorithms, each plaintext candidate has to be hashed with each unique salt. therefore when cracking salted hashes, your effective speed is the total speed divided by number of unique salts. so if your single salt performance is 400 H/sec and you have 13681 unique salts, then your effective speed is 0.03 H/sec. the only way to speed this up is to eliminate salts as quickly as possible. this is accomplished by stacking your attacks in probabilistic order, so that you remove as many salts as possible in your first few passes. RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - Mem5 - 01-13-2014 Ok. Quote:this is accomplished by stacking your attacks in probabilistic order, so that you remove as many salts as possible in your first few passesHow can I do that ? RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - undeath - 01-13-2014 thinking. RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - Mem5 - 01-13-2014 Hum. I mean, I am not english, and I did not really understand what epixoip explained, especially last sentence. If I remove (erase?) salts, I also delete the hash, right ? but that is not what I want..! RE: O H/sec with PhpBB - undeath - 01-13-2014 not erase but crack. start with small wordlists which have a high hit probability. |