+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Feature Requests (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: maskprocessor --increment (/thread-315.html)
Pages:
1
2
maskprocessor --increment - radix - 02-23-2011
Would like to see this so I don't have to manually pipe new instances into ocl+.
RE: maskprocessor --increment - Jardeath - 02-24-2011
I agree, it would be good. I remember the first time I have used oclhc and I tried to use --increment on the masks
RE: maskprocessor --increment - acubens - 02-24-2011
(02-23-2011, 04:47 PM)radix Wrote: Would like to see this so I don't have to manually pipe new instances into ocl+.
agreed, although crunch does the trick for me too
RE: maskprocessor --increment - atom - 02-24-2011
crunch is a mask processor?
RE: maskprocessor --increment - acubens - 02-24-2011
(02-24-2011, 06:07 PM)atom Wrote: crunch is a mask processor?
yes, shipped with backtrack. But you can't define charsets, so its rather weak in this regard (masks are called pattern there):
-t [FIXED]@%^* : allows you to specify a pattern, eg: @@god@@@@
where the only the @'s will change with lowercase letters
the's will change with uppercase letters
the %'s will change with numbers
the ^'s will change with symbols
RE: maskprocessor --increment - atom - 02-25-2011
cool, did not know that. is it also that fast as mp? for example, if i do:
root@sf:~/maskprocessor-0.64# time ./mp64.bin ?l?l?l?l?l?l -o /dev/null
real 0m2.838s
user 0m2.720s
sys 0m0.110s
that is 26^6 / 2.8 = 108 M/s
RE: maskprocessor --increment - acubens - 02-25-2011
(02-25-2011, 12:46 PM)atom Wrote: cool, did not know that. is it also that fast as mp? for example, if i do:
root@sf:~/maskprocessor-0.64# time ./mp64.bin ?l?l?l?l?l?l -o /dev/null
real 0m2.838s
user 0m2.720s
sys 0m0.110s
that is 26^6 / 2.8 = 108 M/s
Definitely not. Its hard to test because it waits some seconds at the beginning to let you think, but I just got these lame results even when not using a mask but 6 char lower alpha as in your example:
#time ./crunch 6 6 -f ./charset.lst lalpha -o /dev/null
Crunch will now generate the following amount of data: 2162410432 bytes 2062 MB 2 GB
Crunch will now generate the following number of lines: 308915776
17%
34%
51%
68%
84%
100%
real 1m1.957s
user 0m58.360s
sys 0m0.576s
RE: maskprocessor --increment - Hash-IT - 11-15-2011
I would also like to be able to --increment maskprocessor, if you would consider it.
I am making password lists and I decided to make some patterns like...
!
!!
!!!
!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!!
etc
I thought maskprocessor would be the perfect tool for this but haven't been able to work out how to do it in a smart way, ie not typing out multiple commands. --increment would be perfect as I guess I could use the following then...
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1?1?1?1?1?1 --increment -o new_word_list.txt
Considerably neater code than ...
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1 -o new_word_list.txt
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1?1 -o new_word_list.txt
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1?1?1 -o new_word_list.txt
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1?1?1?1 -o new_word_list.txt
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1?1?1?1?1 -o new_word_list.txt
mp32.exe -1 ! ?1?1?1?1?1?1 -o new_word_list.txt
Especially when I intend to change the "!" a lot.
RE: maskprocessor --increment - atom - 11-16-2011
ok, will do that
RE: maskprocessor --increment - Hash-IT - 11-16-2011
(11-16-2011, 12:30 PM)atom Wrote: ok, will do that
Thank you so much this will be very useful
Fantastic
-------------|
Awesome
-------------------|
-----------------------------| < You are here.