![]() |
Distributed oclhashcat version - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Feature Requests (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: Distributed oclhashcat version (/thread-327.html) |
Distributed oclhashcat version - tatgdi - 03-08-2011 To take on the challenge of brute-forcing digest keyspace above 11 charachters via bruteforce method. This would be possible if there was a distrubted version of oclhashcat, one could harness the power of sevral systems instead of 1 single box with ie x4 ATI 5970's(8 cores)/6990's(8cores) or even the upcomming Nvidia 590 GTX. Having multiple systems of the above calibre would be very resourcesful and pratical for bruteforcing. ![]() RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - atom - 03-08-2011 this is already possible. see blandys successfull approach to get the idea behind: http://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/projects.aspx RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - tatgdi - 03-10-2011 (03-08-2011, 06:04 PM)atom Wrote: this is already possible. see blandys successfull approach to get the idea behind: http://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/projects.aspx Hey Atom, I imagine the challenge would be in scripting the front end application that would allow oclhascat to become distributed; is this correct? If I am not mistaken have you not made hashcat into a distributed application? The following link that you provided is definitely a great start but what about locating a open-source front end that exists that would allow oclhascat to become distributed as an alternative option? RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - atom - 03-11-2011 yes a lot people already asked for such an automatic solution and as you can see its absolutly possible. but i am focusing hashcat development. what i want to say is this can be done by some 3rd person. RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - thorsheim - 05-16-2012 Elcomsoft and Passware does distributed, with a server that can be passive in that it only distributes tasks and collects 'replies', or it can also do cracking itself as an active node. A 'server' would take as input the command line for -plus (or -lite), and break the total task into sub-tasks (sub-keyspaces) with an estimate of perhaps a couple of (gpu) minutes to finish each sub-task (depending on gpu on 'agent'). Results (hash:plain ![]() or something like that. Morning, off to work. :-) RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - atom - 05-16-2012 There are already some nice 3rd party distribution solutions for oclHashcat-lite for SL3. With some small changes, they could support all the other algorithms as well. All it takes is their will to rewrite it. Its also a very good example why it can be clever to source this thing out to some 3rd party. See here: http://www.servmg.com/uploaded/sl3cloud/sl3cloud4.png http://winiu.com/support/sl3client/shot_000002.png http://www.sl3net.com/cpanel/SL3NET-CPANEL-01.jpg http://www.sl3net.com/cpanel/SL3NET-CPANEL-04.jpg There are even more solutions, but their servers are down so I was unable to fetch more screenshots. RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - KT819GM - 05-16-2012 @atom Don't forget that they ask money for that like on sample pic's Martech ~20EU / pc. ---------------- If you earn for living by doing hash cracking ask them to support other algo's, people under that name have some nice brain power ![]() There is some more sw (free, opensource) which can control these processes, just need to look at them and build something suitable. RE: Distributed oclhashcat version - atom - 09-07-2012 Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html Thread closed |