E-mail hashes - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: General Help (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: E-mail hashes (/thread-3740.html) |
E-mail hashes - giveen - 10-14-2014 What is better? I am trying to work on hashes.org huge list of emails that were hashed, but I've run into a slow-down Combination attack wordlist + list of domains with a ^@ set on the right dictionary My dictionary consists of facebook names, plus various other lists of names. or Straight attack with a rule with rules like this l$@$a$o$l$.$c$o$m RE: E-mail hashes - coolbry95 - 10-14-2014 Do attacks like with the rules. Note that it will only be able to append up to 15 so use combinator for the ones that are above that. Also switch the @ for a $ and you should get a few more. RE: E-mail hashes - atom - 10-14-2014 From performance perspective, if you have enough domains (1k+) in the right dictionary, combinator is simply faster (no interpreter involed). RE: E-mail hashes - giveen - 10-14-2014 I have a 1 million+ domain list Is there a way to apply a rules list to a dictionary in a combo attack rather than just using simple rules? I would like to do something like best64 to the user list in the combo attack RE: E-mail hashes - atom - 10-14-2014 I'd say use hashcat in --stdout mode to either generate a new dictionary or pipe it to oclHashcat RE: E-mail hashes - giveen - 10-14-2014 (10-14-2014, 02:11 PM)atom Wrote: I'd say use hashcat in --stdout mode to either generate a new dictionary or pipe it to oclHashcat Okay, I'll try that. Right now, my username list is sitting around 9 million (bunch of dumps + the 5 million gmail dump) Trying to find more. |