+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html)
+--- Forum: Old hashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-20.html)
+--- Thread: Speedcheck please (/thread-3779.html)
Speedcheck please - hongman - 10-24-2014
Hi
I just wanted to ask to see if others thought this speed is correct, as the hardware is old and I have no idea what to expect!
Windows 8.1 64 bit, Intel Core i7 920 (8core @ 2.67Ghz).
Latest version of hashcat, hashing against WPA with 8 char password, all lower case alpla only.
Command I am using:
hashcat-cli64.exe -m 2500 -a 3 wpa.hccap --pw-min= 8 --custom-charset= ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?L
Input.Mode: Mask (?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l) [8]
Index.....: 0/1 (segment), 208827064576 (words), 0 (bytes)
Recovered.: 0/1 hashes, 0/1 salts
Speed/sec.: - plains, 2.38k words
Progress..: 11746836/208827064576 (0.01%)
Running...: 00:01:22:17
Estimated.: 285:21:46:48
Obviously with it like this I'm going to be waiting a long time!
On my CPU widget all 8 cores are maxed out.
Same with oclhash on same PC, running Nvidia GeForce GT 630. Downloaded and installed latest Cuda Toolkit.
cudaHashcat64.exe -m 2500 -a 3 wpa.hccap -1 ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
Session.Name...: cudaHashcat
Status.........: Aborted
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3) [8]
Hash.Target....:
Hash.Type......: WPA/WPA2
Time.Started...: Fri Oct 24 04:57:55 2014 (1 min, 34 secs)
Time.Estimated.: > 10 Years
Speed.GPU.#1...: 8174 H/s
Recovered......: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.......: 761856/5533380698112 (0.00%)
Skipped........: 0/761856 (0.00%)
Rejected.......: 0/761856 (0.00%)
HWMon.GPU.#1...: 20% Util, 60c Temp, N/A Fan
Started: Fri Oct 24 04:57:55 2014
Stopped: Fri Oct 24 04:59:30 2014
Should I decide to shop about for a better card, is there a website which lists expected hashrates on various models so can get a better idea on budget vs speed?
EDIT: Just seen the keyspace totals are wildly different, so I know the syntax is wrong lol, but original question stands, are those speeds right :p
RE: Speedcheck please - Rolf - 10-24-2014
Speeds are alright.
You can compare bang for buck here.
Keyspace is different because the second example's output is for a different command (take a look at the mask).
RE: Speedcheck please - undeath - 10-24-2014
(10-24-2014, 12:25 PM)Rolf Wrote: Keyspace is different because the second example's output is for a different command (take a look at the mask).not the mask but wrong usage.
RE: Speedcheck please - hongman - 10-24-2014
Thanks guys, figured out the right syntax
RE: Speedcheck please - hongman - 10-24-2014
Just out of curiosity.
When figuring out hash rates, apart from cores/clock speed, how much influence does things like RAM and HDD speed make?
RE: Speedcheck please - undeath - 10-24-2014
here's the formular:
(((amount of ram in gb)*(cpu clock speed in GHz))/((hdd size in gb)*(hdd max read speed in mb/s)+(wordlist size in gb)))*ln(1)
RE: Speedcheck please - epixoip - 10-25-2014
how long did it take you to think that up?
RE: Speedcheck please - Rolf - 10-25-2014
I see what you did there
