Help with output - Printable Version

Help with output - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html)
+--- Forum: Old hashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-20.html)
+--- Thread: Help with output (/thread-3992.html)

Help with output - Eximo - 01-18-2015

Hello, I am using CPU Hashcat v0.49
I have list like a :

Code:
example1@gmail.com:724128f922c5188c

example2@hotmail.com:67b706bf564a5f1d

example3@gmail.com:07b3c4f43ea47312

And i'm trying to get output + remove success lines from first list :

Code:
example1@gmail.com:tattoo

example2@hotmail.com:beanie1

example3@gmail.com:monkey16

If I use

Code:
hashcat-cli64.exe -m 200 -o test.txt -p : --username --show --remove hash.txt word/

I got

Code:
example1@gmail.com:724128f922c5188c:tattoo

example2@hotmail.com:67b706bf564a5f1d:beanie1

example3@gmail.com:07b3c4f43ea47312:monkey16

If I use

Code:
hashcat-cli64.exe -m 200 -o test.txt --outfile-format=2 -p : --username --show --remove hash.txt word/

I got

Code:
tattoo

beanie1

monkey16

I tried many times but still no result.
Thank you for help.

RE: Help with output - philsmd - 01-20-2015

Unfortunately cpu hashcat doesn't support --username together with --show/--left/--remove yet.

That means, if you use --username with --remove, the user names won't end up in the new/modified hash list.
Also --show and --left do not really support to display the user field (warning: one example above contains the user field or emails in your case, but just because the whole input line is outputted).

There is also good news:
1. you can request this enhancement/feature on trac ( https://hashcat.net/trac/ )
2. oclHashcat already supports this (but this is also kind of a new feature in oclHashcat, see: https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/116 and https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/513 )

That also means, you can use oclHashcat if you want to "only" use your "--outfile-format 2 --username --show" example and it will already work now.
But please consider opening a ticket on trac s.t. it will be implemented.
thx