v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: Old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-38.html) +--- Thread: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it (/thread-4162.html) |
v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it - smile - 03-06-2015 With my hashlist : Speed of v1.31/1.32/1.33 :2400 MH/s Speed of v1.21 :7000 Mh/s I said it on my last post, but nobody believe me. So I send the example hashlist and command to atom, but he refused to test it. Can anyone test it ? My example hashlist and command link is: http://www.jinniu.in/test.zip My last post is : http://hashcat.net/forum/thread-3744.html Quote:atom Online RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it - undeath - 03-06-2015 did you read this thread? https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4161.html RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it - smile - 03-06-2015 (03-06-2015, 03:52 PM)undeath Wrote: did you read this thread? https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4161.html Yes, did you test my example? RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it - atom - 03-06-2015 I've reproduced the case, it's actually slower. Thanks for reporting! But no worries, I already found the reason and fixed it. The bitmaps were optimized to run faster on a different hashlist size (much smaller one), but I an see that hashlist size around 500k is what we deal most of the time. Old 1.33: Quote:root@et:~/oclHashcat-1.34# ./oclHashcat64.bin 1015.notfound ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -a 3 -1 ?l?d -w 3 -o x New 1.34: Quote:root@et:~/oclHashcat-1.34# ./oclHashcat64.bin 1015.notfound ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -a 3 -1 ?l?d -w 3 -o x RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it - LDA - 03-12-2015 Hi atom, And where can we download the 1.34 version? Thanks. |