wpa &wpa2 - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html) +--- Forum: Old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-38.html) +--- Thread: wpa &wpa2 (/thread-4394.html) |
wpa &wpa2 - bobva - 05-28-2015 Hi i try to crack a wpa and wpa2 password from my AP i use 6 titan z and i get slow speed like 10k/s and for ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d a get 10 year to final... what can i do? if i get many handcheck this is help me? bob RE: wpa &wpa2 - undeath - 05-28-2015 something's wrong with your setup. According to this benchmark a single Titan X should archive ~280k/s RE: wpa &wpa2 - bobva - 05-28-2015 (05-28-2015, 11:08 AM)undeath Wrote: something's wrong with your setup. According to this benchmark a single Titan X should archive ~280k/s I TRY THIS BUT I DIDNT GET A FAST SPEEDף CUDAHASHCAT64.EXE -A 3 C:\1.HCCAP -1 ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a -m 2500 --benchmark-mode 0 -w 2 -u 1024 -n 32 and i get 100Kh/s RE: wpa &wpa2 - xoxox - 05-28-2015 (05-28-2015, 11:55 AM)bobva Wrote:(05-28-2015, 11:08 AM)undeath Wrote: something's wrong with your setup. According to this benchmark a single Titan X should archive ~280k/s looks like you pass the mask as charset (-1) and the -A should be -a try it like this instead: CUDAHASHCAT64.EXE -a 3 -m 2500 --benchmark-mode 0 -w 2 -u 1024 -n 32 C:\1.HCCAP ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a RE: wpa &wpa2 - bobva - 05-31-2015 (05-28-2015, 12:24 PM)xoxox Wrote:(05-28-2015, 11:55 AM)bobva Wrote:(05-28-2015, 11:08 AM)undeath Wrote: something's wrong with your setup. According to this benchmark a single Titan X should archive ~280k/s i try this but the speed dont up RE: wpa &wpa2 - epixoip - 05-31-2015 ''-w 2'' together with ''-n 32 -u 1024'' does not make any sense. Use one or the other. The latter is sub-optimal. Ideally you should use neither, and use -w 3 instead. Further, Titan Z is not the Titan X. Titan Z will be ~ 20% slower than 2x GTX 780Ti, so roughly 140 KH/s when properly tuned. Then do the math: 95^8 / 140000 / 31556926 =~ 1,502 years. RE: wpa &wpa2 - bobva - 05-31-2015 (05-31-2015, 07:58 AM)epixoip Wrote: ''-w 2'' together with ''-n 32 -u 1024'' does not make any sense. Use one or the other. The latter is sub-optimal. Ideally you should use neither, and use -w 3 instead. ok so what can i do? if i collect many hand check this is help? if i can buy any GPU card what buy? gtx780ti? titan z?titan x? samethink else? RE: wpa &wpa2 - xoxox - 06-01-2015 (05-31-2015, 10:22 AM)bobva Wrote:(05-31-2015, 07:58 AM)epixoip Wrote: ''-w 2'' together with ''-n 32 -u 1024'' does not make any sense. Use one or the other. The latter is sub-optimal. Ideally you should use neither, and use -w 3 instead. more handshakes don't help more GPU does RE: wpa &wpa2 - bobva - 06-01-2015 (06-01-2015, 08:45 AM)xoxox Wrote:(05-31-2015, 10:22 AM)bobva Wrote:(05-31-2015, 07:58 AM)epixoip Wrote: ''-w 2'' together with ''-n 32 -u 1024'' does not make any sense. Use one or the other. The latter is sub-optimal. Ideally you should use neither, and use -w 3 instead. and which card buy? titanz? titan x? what the best? RE: wpa &wpa2 - epixoip - 06-02-2015 Titan X is the best. But no matter which card you buy, you'll never be able to brute force 95^8. You'd need 700 Titan X GPUs to brute force that in one year. |