hashcat Forum
cudaHashcat vs. GeForce 210 - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Previous versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-29.html)
+--- Forum: Old oclHashcat Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-38.html)
+--- Thread: cudaHashcat vs. GeForce 210 (/thread-5073.html)



cudaHashcat vs. GeForce 210 - delasa - 01-21-2016

Dear friends,

Whether cudaHashcat can work on GeForce 210? At least the old version of cudaHashcat. Thanx.

Quote:cudaHashcat v2.01 starting...

Device #1: GeForce 210, 511MB, 1402Mhz, 2MCU
Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled, it might cause you errors of code 702
           You can disable it with a regpatch, see here: http://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch

Hashes: 1 hashes; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1

Applicable Optimizers:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c

ERROR: Shader Model 1.0 - 1.3 based GPU detected. Support for CUDA was dropped by NVidia.

       Remove it from your system or use -d and select only supported cards.



RE: cudaHashcat vs. GeForce 210 - undeath - 01-21-2016

Old versions are timebombed and no longer working. Your card is too old (and probably slower than your CPU).


RE: cudaHashcat vs. GeForce 210 - delasa - 01-21-2016

My CPU gives ~1200-1400 k/s. I read that my GPU gives about the same. Then the CPU+GPU would have given twice more than CPU.