Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... (/thread-5317.html) |
Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - rchange - 03-10-2016 Is there an actual table of comparison between models Benchmarks: GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380x, R9 380, GTX 960? RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - epixoip - 03-10-2016 No. But I can tell you... R9 390X = Re-badged R9 290X but only available in OEM design, so it's shit R9 380X = Re-badged HD 7970 but only available in OEM design, so it's shit. Oh and also it's a 4 year old card. R9 380 = Re-badged HD 7950 but only available in OEM design, so it's shit. And it too is a 4 year old card. GTX 970 = Approximately same speed as R9 290X/390X when properly tuned, but draws 56% less power! GTX 960 = 40% slower than GTX 970. This is a pretty low-end card, I'd avoid it. Currently the best cards for oclHashcat are (in order): GTX 970, GTX 980, GTX 980 Ti, and GTX Titan X. You can find benchmarks for those models at https://gist.github.com/epixoip RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - rchange - 03-10-2016 Thank you very much, you answered my question 100% RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - epixoip - 03-10-2016 That's why they give me all the stars RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - rchange - 03-10-2016 I agree, I deserved RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - evopilot - 07-01-2016 if it helps i get 86939 H/s using a R9 380 8gb on WPA/WPA2 |