+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html)
+--- Thread: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... (/thread-5317.html)
Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - rchange - 03-10-2016
Is there an actual table of comparison between models Benchmarks:
GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380x, R9 380, GTX 960?
RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - epixoip - 03-10-2016
No. But I can tell you...
R9 390X = Re-badged R9 290X but only available in OEM design, so it's shit
R9 380X = Re-badged HD 7970 but only available in OEM design, so it's shit. Oh and also it's a 4 year old card.
R9 380 = Re-badged HD 7950 but only available in OEM design, so it's shit. And it too is a 4 year old card.
GTX 970 = Approximately same speed as R9 290X/390X when properly tuned, but draws 56% less power!
GTX 960 = 40% slower than GTX 970. This is a pretty low-end card, I'd avoid it.
Currently the best cards for oclHashcat are (in order): GTX 970, GTX 980, GTX 980 Ti, and GTX Titan X.
You can find benchmarks for those models at https://gist.github.com/epixoip
RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - rchange - 03-10-2016
Thank you very much, you answered my question 100%
RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - epixoip - 03-10-2016
That's why they give me all the stars
RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - rchange - 03-10-2016
I agree, I deserved
RE: Table Benchmarks GTX 970, R9 390x, R9 380 and... - evopilot - 07-01-2016
if it helps i get 86939 H/s using a R9 380 8gb on WPA/WPA2