Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops (/thread-5551.html) |
Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops - unixm - 06-26-2016 Hi, This is an odd question I suppose but I'd like to know if the parameters specified for gpu-accel & gpu-loops set to something higher than what's supported for the support attack in order to gain more performance can result in the result/password/WPA key etc being missed? For example. I am currently working on a WPA2 crack with a Radeon 290 that when used with gpu-accel 16 & gpu-loops 16 gives me about 121KH/s. When used with gpu-accel 80 & gpu-loops 128 I get 179.1KH/s I've not found anything regarding this question on the forums so I'd just let to get peoples clarification on the matter if I may. This is the crack running at present, Session.Name...: virgin-media Status.........: Running Input.Mode.....: Mask (?2?2?2?2?2?2?2?2) [8] Hash.Target....: virginmediaxxxxxxx (00:8e:f2:6b:58:9c <-> 70:14:a6:d9:7b:ba) Hash.Type......: WPA/WPA2 Time.Started...: Sun Jun 26 19:23:10 2016 (58 secs) Time.Estimated.: Sun Jul 03 13:19:40 2016 (6 days, 17 hours) Speed.GPU.#1...: 179.2 kH/s Recovered......: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 6896640000/110075314176 (6.27%) Rejected.......: 0/6896640000 (0.00%) Restore.Point..: 287334400/4586471424 (6.26%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 100% Util, 70c Temp, 100% Fan I am running it with options: oclhashcat32.exe -m 2500 -a3 c:\users\user\Desktop\virginmedia.hccap --custom-charset2=abcdefghjklmnpqrstuvwxyz ?2?2?2?2?2?2?2?2 --gpu-temp-retain 42 --gpu-accel 80 --gpu-loops 128 --session virgin-media -s 286924800 The only difference (Apart from the increased hash rate), is that the card appears to be working harder and getting hotter than it was set with the 16 / 16 values. Any help/advice greatly appreciated. RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops - atom - 06-29-2016 The direct use of -n and -u will no longer be supported with hashcat v3.00 which will automatically tune them for you. You will be able to select a configuration based on the following profiles: Code: | # | Performance | Runtime | Power Consumption | Desktop Impact | RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops - unixm - 06-29-2016 (06-29-2016, 12:02 PM)atom Wrote: The direct use of -n and -u will no longer be supported with hashcat v3.00 which will automatically tune them for you. You will be able to select a configuration based on the following profiles: Hi Atom, Thanks for your response. Is there a possibility that using values other than what's specified as recommended for WPA2 for example 16 /16 would cause it to skip the correct value or is it a case of finding out what works best to get the best performance out of the GPU ? RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops - atom - 06-29-2016 (06-29-2016, 12:38 PM)unixm Wrote: Is there a possibility that using values other than what's specified as recommended for WPA2 for example 16 /16 would cause it to skip the correct value or is it a case of finding out what works best to get the best performance out of the GPU ? No, all values will find the password, if the password is the correct one RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops - unixm - 06-29-2016 (06-29-2016, 03:22 PM)atom Wrote:(06-29-2016, 12:38 PM)unixm Wrote: Is there a possibility that using values other than what's specified as recommended for WPA2 for example 16 /16 would cause it to skip the correct value or is it a case of finding out what works best to get the best performance out of the GPU ? Great, thanks for the clarification. |