hashcat Forum
[NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help (/thread-5610.html)



[NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - inprivate - 07-06-2016

when i try new version hashcat 3.0, i don't konw what it means

OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
================================================
- Device #1: Capeverde, 576/1024 MB allocatable, 6MCU
- Device #2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5560  @ 2.80GHz, 24567/24567 MB allocatable, 16MCU
Hashtype: MD4
Speed.Dev.#1.:  2446.6 MH/s (95.86ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.:   453.3 MH/s (109.50ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.:  2900.0 MH/s
Hashtype: MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.:  1250.3 MH/s (95.90ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.:   314.2 MH/s (104.22ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.:  1564.4 MH/s

my pc is a dual-cpu sys, X5560*2+AMD 7730(wait to replace), why the dev.#2' speed so slow and who is the dev.#*?

I used oclhashcat-gui, so I first use the command line to control the hashcat, so when in the hashcat 3.0, can the cpu and gpu work togerther to crack the hash like Passcape.Wireless.Password.Recovery?

thank you

================================================================

after I install intel opencl sdk and opencl driver, running the benchmark, something is wrong for this :

C:\天破壤碎\HashCat>hashcat64 -b -D 1,2 --f
hashcat (v3.00-1-g67a8d97) starting in benchmark-mode...
OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
================================================
- Device #1: Capeverde, 576/1024 MB allocatable, 6MCU
- Device #2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5560  @ 2.80GHz, 24567/24567 MB allocatable, 16MCU
OpenCL Platform #2: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
- Device #3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5560  @ 2.80GHz, 6141/24567 MB allocatable, 16MCU
OpenCL Platform #3: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
- Device #4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5560  @ 2.80GHz, 6141/24567 MB allocatable, 16MCU
1 error generated.

ERROR: clBuildProgram() : -11 : CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE


=== Build Options : -I "C:/天破壤碎/HashCat/OpenCL/" -D VENDOR_ID=8 -D CUDA_ARCH=0 -D VECT_SIZE=4 -D DEVICE_TYPE=2 -D DGST_R0=0 -D DGST_R1=3 -D DGST_R2=2 -D DGST_R3=1 -D DGST_ELEM=4 -D KERN_TYPE=900 -D _unroll -cl-std=CL1.1 ===

=== Build Log (start) ===
Compilation started
1:10:10: fatal error: 'inc_vendor.cl' file not found
Compilation failed
=== Build Log (end) ===
- Device #3: Kernel C:\天破壤碎\HashCat/OpenCL/m00900_a3.cl build failure. Proceeding without this device.
1 error generated.

ERROR: clBuildProgram() : -11 : CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE


how does the "ERROR: clBuildProgram() : -11 : CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE" mean?


RE: dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - atom - 07-06-2016

Your CPU is so slow because you are using the AMD driver. For optimal CPU performance with Intel CPUs you need the Intel OpenCL SDK. Capeverde is your GPU.


RE: dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - inprivate - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 09:11 AM)atom Wrote: Your CPU is so slow because you are using the AMD driver. For optimal CPU performance with Intel CPUs you need the Intel OpenCL SDK. Capeverde is your GPU.

I understand!
dev.#1 is gpu
dev.#2 is my CPU
dev.#* is my PC's total cracking capability.
thank you


RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - atom - 07-06-2016

Please stick to 7bit characters for the pathname, it will save you a lot of headache.


RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - inprivate - 07-06-2016

(07-06-2016, 11:49 AM)atom Wrote: Please stick to 7bit characters for the pathname, it will save you a lot of headache.

7bits characters for the pathname means what?


RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - rico - 07-06-2016

It means that "天破壤碎" is probably the problem here.

https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5581.html


RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help - inprivate - 07-07-2016

(07-06-2016, 12:33 PM)rico Wrote: It means that "天破壤碎" is probably the problem here.

https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5581.html

yes, you are right

thanks