hashcat VS aircrack-ng (Intel GPU) - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: hashcat VS aircrack-ng (Intel GPU) (/thread-5697.html) |
hashcat VS aircrack-ng (Intel GPU) - ericgl - 07-24-2016 My System: Win7 Pro wSP1 x64 en-US Intel i5-3570K Ivy Bridge 24GB DDR3 RAM After I managed getting hashcat to work (copied *.cl files to main folder), I tried both hashcat 3.00 x64 and aircrack-ng 1.2 RC4 (not at the same time, of course), on the same cap/hccap file using the same wordlist. hashcat v3.00 x64, using the Intel HD 4000 GPU, can manage ~3600 keys/sec. aircrack-ng-avx v1.2 rc4 x64, using the quad-core CPU, can manage ~6000 keys/sec. I thought using the hashcat with the GPU would give me much better speed. Has any of you guys got similar results, or is something awfully wrong with my system? RE: hashcat VS aircrack-ng (Intel GPU) - atom - 07-24-2016 Nah, Intel GPU are bad, while Intel CPU are good. A good GPU like my 1080 makes ~400000 keys/sec. RE: hashcat VS aircrack-ng (Intel GPU) - ericgl - 07-24-2016 wow...400,000 ! That's quick. |